Jump to content

When SpamCop cannot find spammer


showker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Didn't know where to ask this . . . but it seems concerning, and I'd like to know.

Is there a way to show Spamcop the actual spammer when the sutomated Spamcop cannot find it?

Just because the owner of the offending server doesn't accept complaints, don't you think the higher-up provider should be alerted . . . particularly when it's drive-by malware or serious phishing?

As shown here

[edit: image converted - post no images thanks - you can use a tracking URL to safely and conveniently discuss future spam and associated parser responses]

Edited by Farelf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't know where to ask this . . . but it seems concerning, and I'd like to know.

Is there a way to show Spamcop the actual spammer when the sutomated Spamcop cannot find it?

Just because the owner of the offending server doesn't accept complaints, don't you think the higher-up provider should be alerted . . . particularly when it's drive-by malware or serious phishing?

As shown here

I'm not sure what options (if any) are viable for "helping" spamcop when it can't find a suitahle reporting address.

Having said that, don't panic! If Spamcop receives sufficient reports from different people to trigger a lising, then that's a good start towards helping others slow the flow of the spam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you are describing is often called "finding the upstream provider." In this case, SpamCop did in fact find the upstream (direct-allocation) provider at Hostnoc (I checked: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-64-120-128-0-1/pft). This is a direct allocation from ARIN, meaning that the buck stops at Hostnoc (no higher upstream).

I see that SpamCop refuses to use this abuse contact for some unspecified reason. If I were you I would probably take that as a big fat hint that a report would do no good (and might even do evil). Otherwise, you are certainly free to contact them using your own resources.

By the way, it may be missing the mark a bit to describe the operator of this address as "the actual spammer." There are lots of cooks tending this broth in one capacity or another.

-- rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...