Jump to content

APEWS: E-1718287 Recheck


Recommended Posts


I know... this is no APEWS forum, they abuse it by referring people here. I also read the What to do if you're on APEWS article.

Anyway this should be documented somewhere. Please ignore this post if you don't care about APEWS.

APEWS entry E-1718287 is outdated:

Entry matching your Query: E-1718287
CASE: C-131
Unallocated CIDR, no traffic until allocated,
or allocated to bad reputation provider
or allocated but dynamic / generically named IPs,
or bogons, see www.cidr-report.org,
or orphaned IP / CIDR in routing table
Entry created 2014-08-18

The entry now also covers lots of different provider allocations:

inetnum: -
netname:        NL-NETWORKCONCEPTS-20120921
inetnum: -
netname:        RU-REDCOM-20120321
inetnum: -
netname:        DE-EGENTIC-20120921
inetnum: -
netname:        AM-IUNETWORKS-20140702

Each of these providers might or might not be worth an APEWS listing, but at least they should be handled independently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to what seems to be a popular opinion, this is NOT the place to request removal from APEWS.

Unless your email is being blocked because of a listing, it is safe to ignore listings at APEWS - no reputable mail provider uses it to filter incoming email.

As far as I know the information in this article from 2007 still applies: http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/08/what-to-do-if-you-are-listed-on-apews.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...