Jump to content

SpamCop and Google redirections


Laurens

Recommended Posts

As the following quote will prove, SpamCop doesn't identify Google redirections and therefore wants to report to Google. This should be probably implemented so that the real spammers and sites are put down.

Finding links in message body

Recurse multipart:

Parsing HTML part

Resolving link obfuscation

http://www.google.la/url?q=http%3a%2f%2fpa...php%3fz%3dw&9=d

Percent unescape: http://www.google.la/url?q=http://paabu.co...ub1.php?z=w&9=d

host 216.239.53.99 (getting name) no name

host 216.239.53.99 (getting name) no name

Tracking link: http://www.google.la/url?q=http://paabu.co...ub1.php?z=w&9=d

Routing details for 216.239.53.99

[refresh/show] Cached whois for 216.239.53.99 : arin-contact[at]google.com

Using abuse net on arin-contact[at]google.com

abuse net google.com = abuse[at]google.com

Using best contacts abuse[at]google.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the following quote will prove, SpamCop doesn't identify Google redirections and therefore wants to report to Google. This should be probably implemented so that the real spammers and sites are put down.

While I agree that the 'real' destination should be LARTed, if Google is going to allow spammers to use its redirection service they are supporting spammers and deserve to be LARTed in their own right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you also complain to MSN because their redirection service can be abused as well?

Well, actually I do myself since spamcop won't. Interestingly enough, after about a week of complaints, I stopped getting spam redirected from yahoo and msn on that account. Maybe coincidence since neither yahoo nor msn 'bots thought that they could do anything because there was no spam in my complaint (or it didn't come from them - depending on whether I included the whole spam or not). It is also possible that the injecting ISP did something also. Or that the spammer just moved on to another list.

SpamCop detects MSN redirections so it should do the same job with Google in my opinion

You are correct that SpamCop should be consistent.

Miss Betsy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...