kgc@sonic.net Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Julian, et al, looks like the MX host code needs to be updated to work with RR MX records. We, for example, run a single MX record that's RR to a pair of MX handlers. I'm not entirely sure why we set it up this way instead of using a pair of MX records of the same priority but it's still a perfectly valid configuration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Though I'm still unsure of exactly what your scenario is, I suspect that you spent no time reading the Pinned items in this Forum, and from what I can make out of your post, you have a situation that seems to fall outside of a "generic" description. After you take the time to catch a couple of those Pinned items, please be a bit more clueful and specify just what servers, IPs, whatever are involved in your future e-mail, such that you don't cause those that might be in a position to help to spend time playing the guessing game as to what your specific issues are and where and how they show up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 And the answers to those questions should be directed to deputies<at>spamcop.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.