Jump to content

Spam going to my Submit@spamcop address


Recommended Posts

The e-mail address where I submit spam for subsequent processing is being spammed directly. Example with munged address below.

I have never had a virus and I'm up to date with Sophos.

Because I did not foreward these to spamcop I can't actually finish reporting.

Any Ideas how to report these

cheers

DW

SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing:

Message forwarded in html wrapper.

When forwarding spam, use a MIME attachment or text-type message with

the spam enclosed. Do not send spam in HTML format. Sometimes this

error is caused by using a "resend" feature to forward spam.

HTML spam should be sent in text (source code) format.

The email which triggered this auto-response had the following headers:

Return-Path: <darrenp[at]insieme.net>

Received: from vmx2.spamcop.net (sc-smtp2.eq.ironport.com

[192.168.18.82])

by sc-app4.eq.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D5C50A8

for <submit.xxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net>; Wed, 4 Aug 2004

13:07:37 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from www.aghsonline.com (207.114.181.40)

by vmx2.spamcop.net with SMTP; 04 Aug 2004 13:18:27 -0700

Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:38:59 +0000

From: Darrenp <darrenp[at]insieme.net>

Subject: XXXXXXXXXXX, Warning you r infected with spyware

To: xxxxxxxx <submit.xxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net>

References: <BB5626CHE79H0HA2[at]spam.spamcop.net>

In-Reply-To: <BB5626CHE79H0HA2[at]spam.spamcop.net>

Message-ID: <H92H9D8IBHB38HDJ[at]insieme.net>

Reply-To: Scorpion9 <scorpion9[at]cox.net>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/html

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand your complaint, I'd say you need to drop a note to service <at> admin.spamcop.net (though noting that Ellen has started dropping notes that perhaps she now has access to some user account data ... deputies <at> admin.spamcop.net ..???) Provide enough data to prove that it really use, and basically point out that your submit address has bben compromised. Of course, the next question deals with how this was done .... other than pointing out that there are many more bad things out there beyond viruii, and yet again, pointing out that anti-virus software is generally reactionary .. the database only getting update after the virus is out there, been seen/submitted, analyzed, and data generated to identify / fix the thing ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...