Jump to content

DNS update and ZoneEdit.com

boozemun

By boozemun
in SpamCop Reporting Help

Recommended Posts

boozemun Newbie

boozemun

Posted
Posted

I am using a mail server that is set up on a DSL connection. I don't have a static IP and am using DNS Update program with ZoneEdit.com to set up MX records. Email sent from this server is blocked by Spamcop sometimes and not others. Can anyone help?

This one got through:

Return-Path: <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

Delivered-To: spamcop-net-boozemun[at]spamcop.net

Received: (qmail 31808 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 17:53:09 -0000

Received: from unknown (192.168.1.101)

by blade6.cesmail.net with QMQP; 29 Nov 2004 17:53:09 -0000

Received: from mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com (216.173.237.164)

by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 17:53:09 -0000

Received: from mx07.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.99)

by mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 0-042777300

for <msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:45:04 -0500 (EST)

Received: from ppp-68-251-33-154.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.251.33.154] (EHLO sebahar.com)

by mx07.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id 1ee5ba14.23206.198.mx07.stngva01.us.mxservers.net;

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:39:45 -0500 (EST)

Received: from rev-x.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])

by sebahar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3CF2A43A4

for <msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:44:56 -0600 (CST)

Received: from 68.166.157.178

(SquirrelMail authenticated user jlam);

by rev-x.net with HTTP;

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:44:56 -0600 (CST)

Message-ID: <49520.68.166.157.178.1101750296.squirrel[at]68.166.157.178>

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:44:56 -0600 (CST)

Subject: test 1

From: "Julie Lam" <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

To: msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com

User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Importance: Normal

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

X-spam: [F=0.0535637896; heur=0.500(0); stat=0.053; spamtraq-heur=0.500(2004112901)]

X-MAIL-FROM: <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

X-SOURCE-IP: [68.251.33.154]

X-Loop-Detect:1

X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on blade6

X-spam-Level:

X-spam-Status: hits=0.0 tests=none version=3.0.0

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 216.173.237.164 204.202.242.99 68.251.33.154 127.0.0.1 68.166.157.178

This one with an attachment was blocked:

Return-Path: <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

Delivered-To: spamcop-net-boozemun[at]spamcop.net

Received: (qmail 32165 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 18:02:34 -0000

Received: from unknown (192.168.1.103)

by blade5.cesmail.net with QMQP; 29 Nov 2004 18:02:34 -0000

Received: from mail26d.sbc-webhosting.com (216.173.237.167)

by mailgate2.cesmail.net with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 18:02:13 -0000

Received: from mx40.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.12)

by mail26d.sbc-webhosting.com (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 0-03949540

for <msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:54:15 -0500 (EST)

Received: from ppp-68-251-33-154.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.251.33.154] (EHLO sebahar.com)

by mx40.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id ecf5ba14.15643.290.mx40.stngva01.us.mxservers.net;

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:43:42 -0500 (EST)

Received: from rev-x.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])

by sebahar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A71B2A43C0

for <msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:48:54 -0600 (CST)

Received: from 68.166.157.178

(SquirrelMail authenticated user jlam);

by rev-x.net with HTTP;

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:48:54 -0600 (CST)

Message-ID: <49528.68.166.157.178.1101750534.squirrel[at]68.166.157.178>

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:48:54 -0600 (CST)

Subject: test 2

From: "Julie Lam" <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

To: msebahar[at]h-a-intl.com

User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_20041129114854_73426"

X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Importance: Normal

X-spam: [F=0.0100000000; stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.500(2004112901)]

X-MAIL-FROM: <jlam[at]rev-x.net>

X-SOURCE-IP: [68.251.33.154]

X-Loop-Detect:1

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.103 216.173.237.167

X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net

------=_20041129114854_73426

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

------=_20041129114854_73426

Content-Type: image/tiff; name="profile scan.tif"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="profile scan.tif"

TU0AKgAAAAgAEwD+AAQAAAABAAAAAAEAAAMAAAABCC4AAAEBAAMAAAABBb4AAAECAAMAAAADAAAA

8gEDAAMAAAABAAEAAAEGAAMAAAABAAIAAAERAAQAAAABAABMEgEVAAMAAAABAAMAAAEWAAMAAAAB

Bb4AAAEXAAQAAAABAIzobAEaAAUAAAABAAAA+AEbAAUAAAABAAABAAEcAAMAAAABAAEAAAEoAAMA

AAABAAIAAAExAAIAAAAdAAABCAEyAAIAAAAUAAABJgK8AAEAABYVAAABOoZJAAEAADTCAAAXUIdp

AAQAAAABAI00gAAAAAAACAAIAAgALcbAAAAnEAAtxsAAACcQQWRvYmUgUGhvdG9zaG9wIENTIE1h

Truncated by me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
loafman Advanced Member

loafman

Posted
Posted
I am using a mail server that is set up on a DSL connection. I don't have a static IP and am using DNS Update program with ZoneEdit.com to set up MX records. Email sent from this server is blocked by Spamcop sometimes and not others. Can anyone help?

Easy - Sometimes you get an IP address that has been blocked by SpamCop for spamming. The two emails you showed were sent from two different IP addresses, one on the SCBL, the other one not.

SC does not block on your domain, your email address, or anything other than the sending IP address. I would suggest that you use your ISP's SMTP server to send mail and use the mailserver as a receive only machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boozemun Newbie

boozemun

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Easy - Sometimes you get an IP address that has been blocked by SpamCop for spamming.    The two emails you showed were sent from two different IP addresses, one on the SCBL, the other one not.

SC does not block on your domain, your email address, or anything other than the sending IP address.  I would suggest that you use your ISP's SMTP server to send mail and use the mailserver as a receive only machine.

20684[/snapback]

Thanks. I guess I don't understand the IP thing exactly. Isn't SpamCop checking the source IP which is the same in both?

X-SOURCE-IP: [68.251.33.154]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
agsteele Been There

agsteele

Posted
Posted
Thanks. I guess I don't understand the IP thing exactly. Isn't SpamCop checking the source IP which is the same in both?

X-SOURCE-IP: [68.251.33.154]

20685[/snapback]

No the list works from the oldest most reliable and confirmable IP address. The X-Source value isn't reliable - anyone could create that and add it to their headers.

The other reference to your IP is prior to the sending IP address so, again, not reliable.

As others have said, use your ISP's SMTP server to send your outbound mail.

Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boozemun Newbie

boozemun

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Easy - Sometimes you get an IP address that has been blocked by SpamCop for spamming.    The two emails you showed were sent from two different IP addresses, one on the SCBL, the other one not.

SC does not block on your domain, your email address, or anything other than the sending IP address.  I would suggest that you use your ISP's SMTP server to send mail and use the mailserver as a receive only machine.

20684[/snapback]

Thanks, but I am using Mac OS X server and though I can relay SMTP through another server, SBC won't accept it because it requires authentication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wazoo What Life?

Wazoo

Posted
Posted

http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblo...216.173.237.167

216.173.237.167 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2)

If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system it will be delisted automatically in approximately 12 hours.

Causes of listing

System has sent mail to SpamCop spam traps in the past week (spam traps are secret, no reports or evidence are provided by SpamCop)

What isn't known from 'here' is when it got listed .. as compared to when you sent the e-mails

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...