Jeff G. Posted December 19, 2004 Share Posted December 19, 2004 Andrew Engels Rump (formerly Leif Andrew Rump) <newandrew[at]rump.dk> organized electrons in article news:Xns95C3DE5DC6981newandrewrumpdk[at]216.154.195.61 that appeared as follows: > After drinking 3 Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters, Blammo > <ric.gates[at]bigsleep.org> mumbled in news:Xns95C2C9EF6F755blammo[at] > 216.154.195.61: >> On 17 Dec 2004 Gingko entered spamcop.help and left >> news:cpv6jc$jcc$1[at]news.spamcop.net: >>> Two of these spams have addresses like "<number>[at]<my.mail.server>" >>> in the "To" field. >>> With theses addresses, I should have had two "unknown users" in >>> the log files of my SMTP server. >> Not necessarily, To: is not the same as SMTP RCPT TO: > > No and that include Bcc: (and Cc:). We need to get information > from someone who records the SMTP RCPT TO:. I know spamcop.mail > is "dead", but I have posted this to the group hoping that someone > will take it over to the forum - or that I will do it on monday. > > What I am suggesting is that Jeff records the RCPT TO: - just as > my own ISP does in a X-RCPT-TO:. A field just as Return-Path: which > gives the SMTP input from MAIL FROM:. > > Andrew Have you seen the "Delivered-To" Header Line? I've asked for a "for" clause on the Received Header Lines, there hasn't been enough support for that idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.