Wazoo Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Brought over from a PM; Hi, Wazoo! I write you a personal messages, because I have a few long attacments. Short: I use SpamSource in reporting spam. I recive messages wrom SpamCop: SpamCop encountered errors: SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: I have sent reports alos to SpamSource support Cris Price. His answer is below: ================================= I would recommend that you refer this to SpamCop as the attachment (messagedat01.txt) looks correct. I did a search for the error below and found that other people have seen this before, so it may be a bug with the SpamCop parsing engine. You might try sending the error and the Messagedat01.txt attachment to deputies <at> spamcop.net and see if they can explain why it's getting rejected or also you could post the question to the forums on SpamCop. Let me know what you find. Thanks, Chris Price Daedalus Software, LLC http://www.daesoft.com =================================== The original report attachment is below: ============================== Received: via tmail-2004a-sau for viestilu.100; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:16:39 +0300 (EEST) Received: from fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi (fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.28]) by be11.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FAB1A78F4 for <x>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:16:39 +0300 (EEST) Received: from c60.cesmail.net (c60.cesmail.net [216.154.195.49]) by fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D441A72CF for <x>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:16:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from unknown (HELO blade1.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.211) by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 16 Apr 2005 07:18:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 6060 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Apr 2005 11:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: spamcop-net-tmuhonnen <at> spamcop.net Received: (qmail 6009 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2005 11:16:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (192.168.1.101) by blade1.cesmail.net with QMQP; 16 Apr 2005 11:16:33 -0000 Received: from fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi (62.142.5.28) by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 16 Apr 2005 10:16:33 -0000 Received: from jlonline.com (80-218-18-20.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.218.18.20]) by fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FD811A72CB for <x>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:16:31 +0300 (EEST) From: "Randell Dennis" <x> To: "Randolf Thornton" <x> Subject: Re: Va1ium CIALLlS VlAGRA Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:16:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01C54072.4260F40C" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Unsent: 1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-Id: <20050416111631.2FD811A72CB[at]fe13.mail.saunalahti.fi> X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on blade1 X-spam-Level: **** X-spam-Status: hits=4.0 tests=DRUGS_ERECTILE,DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_TINY,HTML_MESSAGE, J_CHICKENPOX_23,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,URIBL_SBL version=3.0.0 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 62.142.5.28 80.218.18.20 Status: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C54072.4260F40C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, He clapped his hat on his head with a certain abrupt fierceness, all their stubborn valour, they ended by being pressed back and b At the upper end, on a raised dais, sat the Lords Commissioners, couch, and sat now upon the edge of it, his elbows on his knees. miles by three, uninhabited save by birds and turtles and bearing arms was to brand himself a coward or a papist. There was a pause. Then, in an even quieter voice than before, in the service of King William, His authority did not warrant his going beyond one tenth. But as Pitt's direction was a southward one, bringing them ever He had observed, for instance, that Blood's ship was named the For lack of a better, laughed the Captain, good-humouredly being in sufficient strength at the time to force the entrance of Have a nice day. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C54072.4260F40C Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Hello,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 3pt"><PRE># # = ##### # = # # # # ## #### ##### ## # # # ## = # # #### # # ## # # # # # = # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # = # # # # # # # # # # # ## = ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # = # # #### # # # # # # # # # ## = # # # # ###### # ### ##### ###### # # ###### = # # # # # ###### # # # # # = # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # = # # # # # # # # # # # # # = # # # # # #### # # # # ##### # # # = ###### # #### # # # ###### # #### # = # </PRE></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>And Many other.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Visit <A=20 href=3D"http: // www.et.remoodxecutio.com">= PahrrmacyByMail SHOP</A> and save up = to =20 6 0 %</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D4>Have a nice = day.</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D4>Try us and you will NOT BE DlSAPPOlNTED!</FONT></DIV> </BLOCKQUOTE> </BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C54072.4260F40C-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted April 19, 2005 Author Share Posted April 19, 2005 Appreciate the thought of not wanting to overload the Forum with your data (noting that this is what a Tracking UTL is all abaout (see the Glossary, linked to from the FAQ ' read before posting')) .. but not sure why it's OK to kick it to me in a PM ..??? You didn't follow the suggestion to bring it to the Forum actually or get it to a Deputy, so I'm doing the next best thing. I'm not familiar with SpamSource, but the "attachment (messagedat01.txt)" doesn't have the right ring for me. I suspect that the format of the spam submittal is incorrect. I gave up trying to play with your provided sample ... the errors between your handling of it, the white-space issues of this application, compounded by my attempts at editing that result ... I got the headers to parse with a target found for the source of the spew, but .... things like the alleged Quoted-Printable text isn't showing as Quote-Printable and it's hard telling from here whether that was spammy construct or something that's been mangled with all the handling. As a third-party thing is in use, does that imply the use of Outlook? SpamSource's page identifies the various modofications it makes to e-mail based on the version of Outlook in use, the version of Exchange that's in use, then also mentions all the "customer modifications" that are available ...???? none of this data is in your query. They are selling version 2.66, but docs reference version 2.65 .... I'll assume you've been through their Forums and such, seeing that the number one item is "Recommended settings for using SpamSource with Spamcop.net" .... just curious that Chris said that there were other users with the same issue ... (actually, I went back and went through the few items in the support Forum ... no sign of others with issues in the 4 Topics showing, nothing in the Knowledgebase other than setting things up [and I'm not totally sure that some of that commentary is correct]) Problem being from this side of the screen, I/we need to see something a bit closer to the original e-mail .... or a Tracking URL of one you've submitted if you can get that far into the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.