Steve Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6798974193z28b88c0ba00dff57ab8934313692034dz Manually reported email in tracking link above to abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp and got this response back: Quote Dear Sir/Madam we are sorry to inform you that the IP address you have given us is not one that we manage directly. if you check this IP address on JPNIC Who is Gateway Whois:http://whois.nic.ad.jp/cgi-bin/whois_gw?key=126.96.36.199/e You will be able to find that this IP address is one owned by PLALA. Please contact PLALA for further assistance. Thank you for your kind understanding on this matter. Sincerely, OCN Internet Security Team Ikeda ----- OCN Internet Security Team E-mail : abuse_support AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp Using the JPNIC whois query resulted in the abuse POC being super AT plala DOT or DOT jp. Refreshing the cache doesn't change it. For some reason SC is using APNIC instead of JPNIC to determine the correct abuse POC for this IP address. Cache info: Quote "whois 188.8.131.52 AT whois DOT apnic DOT net" (Getting contact from whois DOT apnic DOT net mirror)Display data: Abuse address in 'remarks' field: abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp Lookup irt-jpnic-jp AT whois DOT apnic DOT net "whois irt-jpnic-jp AT whois DOT apnic DOT net" (Getting contact from whois DOT apnic DOT net mirror) Display data: irt-jpnic-jp = whois DOT apnic DOT net found abuse contacts for 184.108.40.206 = abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp whois: 220.127.116.11 - 18.104.22.168 = abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jpRouting details for 22.214.171.124 Using abuse net on abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp abuse net ocn DOT ad DOT jp = abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp Using best contacts abuse AT ocn DOT ad DOT jp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.