recently 202.108.3.173 is always block by you

[sinaspamcop]

recently 202.108.3.173 is always block by you, how can we avoid to block by you ,.

we are large Mail Service Provider , we provide these domains email service ------sina.com.cn vip.sina.com.cn 51uc.com xxx.sina.net , you can view this page to known us http://corp.sina.com.cn/eng/sina_intr_eng.htm.

[Wazoo]

http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblo...p=202.108.3.173

202.108.3.173 not listed in bl.spamcop.net

Apparently just de-listed - thanks to the automated portion of the SCBL?

Parsing input: 202.108.3.173

host 202.108.3.173 = smtp.vip.sina.com (cached)

Routing details for 202.108.3.173

Report routing for 202.108.3.173: abuse[at]sina.com

http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddr...g=202.108.3.173

Volume Statistics for this IP

Magnitude Vol Change vs. Average

Last day ........ 3.5 .. -34%

Last 30 days .. 3.9 ... 79%

Average ........ 3.6

ISP control center

202.108.3.173

Most recent spam reported about 8 hours ago

how can we avoid to block by you

What is SpamCop?

Why am I Blocked?

Help for abuse-desks and administrators

None of this should be "new" to you folks.

[Merlyn]

recently 202.108.3.173  is always block by you, how can we avoid to block by you ,.

34771[/snapback]

It is easy, remove your spammers.

[Jeff G.]

The most recent incident regarding IP Address 202.108.3.173 was about 11 hours ago (probably an email to a spamtrap. Recent Report History for that IP Address follows:

Submitted: Saturday, August 20, 2005 01:59:28 -0400:

=?gb2312?B?wF2q+KleoXW936F2qOyps6FJ?=

    * 1491953063 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster#dcb.hz.zj.cn[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491953062 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam#ns.chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491953060 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: antispam[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1491953056 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster[at]zj.cn

    * 1491953054 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: master[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1491953051 ( http://seiko45.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam[at]mail.tzptt.zj.cn

    * 1491953048 ( http://ad98866.eicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: ct-abuse[at]abuse.sprint.net

    * 1491953046 ( http://ad98866.eicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: hpnut[at]mail.yn.cninfo.net

    * 1491953043 ( http://ad98866.eicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net

    * 1491953039 ( http://ad98866.eicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: postmaster#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491953037 ( Forwarded spam ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

    * 1491953031 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

    * 1491953016 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Saturday, August 20, 2005 01:04:28 -0400:

=?gb2312?B?wF2q+KleoXW936F2qOyps6FJLLnapNGoz6TiwPS/9g==?=

    * 1491936406 ( http://sf988888.oicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: ct-abuse[at]abuse.sprint.net

    * 1491936402 ( http://sf988888.oicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: hpnut[at]mail.yn.cninfo.net

    * 1491936394 ( http://sf988888.oicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net

    * 1491936393 ( http://sf988888.oicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: postmaster#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491936391 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster#dcb.hz.zj.cn[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491936389 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam#ns.chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1491936383 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: antispam[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1491936379 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster[at]zj.cn

    * 1491936371 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: master[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1491936363 ( http://seiko44.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam[at]mail.tzptt.zj.cn

    * 1491936360 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

    * 1491936355 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Friday, August 19, 2005 22:05:42 -0400:

=?gb2312?B?wF2q+KleoXW936F2qOyps6FJ?=

    * 1491864742 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Monday, August 15, 2005 14:57:05 -0400:

=?gb2312?B?vHioRLV7pqGhQrTlwLi0+rjVpEit+6FBprO3TqrMvdC2aaRKoUMyMDA1LTgtMTYxOj...

    * 1488928753 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Sunday, August 14, 2005 06:43:34 -0400:

=?big5?B?rLCxeqq6uXG4o7xXsku3c6bmwFmnYX4=?=

    * 1488031344 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Friday, August 12, 2005 21:37:54 -0400:

=?gb2312?B?IDW4ub73quS+97Hxv/Y=?=

    * 1487323188 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster#dcb.hz.zj.cn[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1487323187 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam#ns.chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1487323186 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: antispam[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1487323185 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: postmaster[at]zj.cn

    * 1487323184 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: master[at]dcb.hz.zj.cn

    * 1487323182 ( http://seiko71.5fox.net/ ) To: anti-spam[at]mail.tzptt.zj.cn

    * 1487323180 ( http://cnbank.xicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: ct-abuse[at]abuse.sprint.net

    * 1487323179 ( http://cnbank.xicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: hpnut[at]mail.yn.cninfo.net

    * 1487323177 ( http://cnbank.xicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net

    * 1487323176 ( http://cnbank.xicp.net/return/return.asp?email=x ) To: postmaster#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    * 1487323175 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

    * 1487323174 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 01:55:47 -0400:

=?big5?B?IENLrbepfK/DrPmp+sPopGu/9qH7okM1OTk=?=

    * 1485500457 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: abuse[at]sina.com

Submitted: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:49:13 -0400:

MAXELL LITHIUM BUTTON CELLS OFFER

    * 1476848834 ( 202.108.3.173 ) To: relays[at]admin.spamcop.net

    * 1476848833 ( 219.136.171.161 ) To: nomaster[at]devnull.spamcop.net

What have you done to address the issues raised by those Reports? Thanks!