SpamAssassain over limit but not held

[michaelanglo]

As can be seen, SpamAssassin gave a score of 4.5 yet the email was not held even though my threshhold = 3 and at least one email was held at the 4 level in the same batch.

Return-Path: <cgsgiw73bqv[at]wmn.net>

Delivered-To: cqmail-net-a.x[at]cqmail.net

Received: (qmail 8847 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 08:04:44 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO c60.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.105)

by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 08:04:44 -0000

Received: from mailgate.cesmail.net (216.154.195.36)

by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 02 Mar 2004 03:04:43 -0500

Received: (qmail 18511 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 08:04:44 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101)

by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 08:04:44 -0000

Received: from pop3.lineone.net [212.74.114.58]

by mailgate.cesmail.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.1)

for a.x[at]cqmail.net (single-drop); Tue, 02 Mar 2004 03:04:44 -0500 (EST)

Received: from denise.ndl.nctu.edu.tw (140.113.19.172) by mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com (7.0.024.3-1)

id 40432E2E00203FCD; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:56:51 +0000

Received: from 37.72.140.124 by 140.113.19.172; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:51:28 +0300

From: "Missy Otilia" <cgsgiw73bqv[at]wmn.net>

Reply-To: "Missy Otilia" <cgsgiw73bqv[at]wmn.net>

To: m.docherty[at]lineone.net, eddiewinter[at]lineone.net, m.dodds[at]lineone.net, a.x[at]lineone.net

Subject: here u can buy soft.ware at che-ap lovastatin friendship

Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 05:47:28 -0200

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.2110.2

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="52076392204683927"

Message-ID: <3xp5jnqpg-ir9ihve-uchbcgsgiw73bqv[at]wmn.net>

X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4

X-spam-Level:

X-spam-Status: hits=-4.5 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE

version=2.63

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 212.74.114.58 140.113.19.172 7.0.24.3 37.72.140.124 140.113.19.172

[\QUOTE]

[PeterJ]

Actually this one has a negative score (no doubt incorrectly.) There has been some discussion of this recently, just check the forum.

[michaelanglo]

Oops !

Didn't spot the "-", thank you.