StevenUnderwood Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 ********************************************** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ********************************************** The original message was received at Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:22:20 +1100 from c60.cesmail.net [216.154.195.49] ----- Transcript of session follows ----- Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 5 days old I will assume your sparsely commented message is indicating messages are not being delivered. I just tested it and my message was delivered within seconds. There are lots of reasons for delivery delay, often related to the receiving side. We know the sending side is attempting the delivery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petzl Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I will assume your sparsely commented message is indicating messages are not being delivered. I just tested it and my message was delivered within seconds. There are lots of reasons for delivery delay, often related to the receiving side. We know the sending side is attempting the delivery. Thought it may of been our email!!! But you are right after re-Reading bounce Seems OK now Supports my argument about NEVER accepting an email address an ISP dumps on you if you consider email important. A SpamCop email address is the only email addres you ill ever need Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzr1tv Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 First, all the caveats: <snip> - Outgoing service is not to be used for high volumes. Please don't put your whole office on it, send to your 1000-user mailing list, etc. It's a privilege, not a right. Any abuse will result in your access being cut off instantly with no warnings. I hate to get picky.. but could I get some clarification on this.... Sometime is 1Q2007, I would like to do a mailing 20 sets of 19-23 people, I have previously been doing this via my SMTPAUTH server of my ISP. 1) Is 20 sets of 20-25 people considered "High volumes". 2) Most of the people I send to will fall into on of two categories - Large Fortune 500 corporations using Exchange or Lotus Notes - State Governments using the same. I have been doing this for 6 years another way.. but the 'reputation' of my outbound mailer is caused my problems a few of the years... Some people abused the SMTPAUTH and made it bad for all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telarin Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 I would say that 400 messages all at once is probably pretty high volume. On the other hand, if you are just sending to 20 people at a time, and don't do all the groups on a single day, then I doubt that would be considered high-volume Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzr1tv Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 I would say that 400 messages all at once is probably pretty high volume. On the other hand, if you are just sending to 20 people at a time, and don't do all the groups on a single day, then I doubt that would be considered high-volume Unfortunately they all have to go out in one night. I send out invites for a seminar, and everyone needs to ahve the same shot at it... It's free we only do these 2-3 times a year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Unfortunately they all have to go out in one night. ...Well, 400 ain't 1,000 but as Will says, a largish chunk thereof - suggest you contact JT to clear the way JIC. If you haven't his mail address, use the contact form - http://mail.spamcop.net/contact.php Q1 draws nigh ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_L Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 I just got around to testing this with a few emails. It worked successfully, using Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 on Linux (Mepis 6.0). My ISP is Embarq/Earthlink. I set the port to 25, and selected "TLS, if available". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xar Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 I'm using Outlook 2002, port 587 with the SSL box ON, and I'm able to send messages perfectly - which is great because I'm in a hotel! Thank you!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzr1tv Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 I know it's BETA and test.... But it appears to be down, at least for me as of 11:36AM US Eastern... for SMTP on port 587 was working last night as of 9:41PM... Is it just me? It's been SO flawless... I have to remember my ISP 'backdoor' SMTP server name now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 I know it's BETA and test.... But it appears to be down, at least for me as of 11:36AM US Eastern... for SMTP on port 587 was working last night as of 9:41PM... Is it just me? It's been SO flawless... I have to remember my ISP 'backdoor' SMTP server name now.... I am not at home so can not test it fully but the server seems to be responding to my manual test. telnet smtp.cesmail.net 587 220 relay.cesmail.net ESMTP Postfix (Ubuntu) ehlo underwood.spamcop.net 250-relay.cesmail.net 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 10240000 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN If we get others with problems, I would then suggest amn email be sent off to JT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejay Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 If we get others with problems, I would then suggest amn email be sent off to JT. I am also having problems, outlook error message "Your email server rejected your login" Who / what is JT, please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 I am also having problems, outlook error message "Your email server rejected your login" Who / what is JT, please? He is the owner/admin of the spamcop.net email service. His email address is: support[at]spamcop.net Try to keep the message short and to the point (he is very busy). I usually also point to the forum entry if he needs more details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzr1tv Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Message sent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motobojo Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 (edited) It has been failing for me the past couple of hours after working flawlessly since it's inception. I've sent an email to support <at> spamcop.net Edited January 16, 2007 by motobojo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdpinpdx Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 If we get others with problems, I would then suggest amn email be sent off to JT. Me too. It's rejecting my password now, but the IMAP server isn't. It was working at about 8:00 AM (pacific), the not at 10:30 AM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enigma Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 I have also send mail problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul.hunt Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 (edited) I have been using this SMTP feature for a while now in Apple Mail with no problems. However, I just got back in the office and tried to send my first email of the day and it is rejecting my password. And now it is working again. Edited January 16, 2007 by paul.hunt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejay Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 He is the owner/admin of the spamcop.net email service. His email address is: support[at]spamcop.net Try to keep the message short and to the point (he is very busy). I usually also point to the forum entry if he needs more details. All OK now - thanks to all concerned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xar Posted January 28, 2007 Share Posted January 28, 2007 (edited) For the last month or so I've been running getting my mail through spamcop using Outlook 2002 with the following settings: (POP3) pop.spamcop.net port 995 SSL Security ON (SMTP) smtp.cesmail.net port 587 SSL Security ON This has been working great - until today. Now I am getting the following error: Task 'SpamCop - Sending and Receiving' reported error (0x800CCC7D) : 'Your outgoing (SMTP) server does not support SSL-secured connections. If SSL-secured connections have worked in the past, contact your server administrator or Internet service provider (ISP). I tried again and got this error: Task 'SpamCop - Sending and Receiving' reported error (0x80004005) : 'The operation failed.' Both errors occurred at 5:15-5:18 PM Eastern USA Time, 01/28/2007. Edited January 28, 2007 by Xar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xar Posted January 28, 2007 Share Posted January 28, 2007 It's working again now. Don't know why it wasn't before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexmathew Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 Hi: Is the SMTP Feature out of Beta ? Thanks AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 Officially, no change. In reality, lots of folks using it with no issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Checking before I go upstream .... My main system fried .... many issues on that of itself, but not germane ... Trying to fire up other systems, have been running into 'mission impossible' .. made a few comments elsewhere that met with "no problems seen" by other folks ... My failures came from OE6 running under Win-XP Pro & Home editions, and Apple Mail under OS-X 10.2.xxx .... tried again on yet another recently repaired laptop ... (OE6 under Win-98SE) where I'm at .. trying to use port 587 has been a total failure, focusing on the various "security' settings ... Was getting "certificate" doesn't match warnings .... For giggles, dropped the port 587 call back to the defailt port 25 ... damned outgoing e-mail went out .... Went back to one of the XP systems, changed that to use port 25 ... that e-mail that's been hanging around in the OutBox for a while just got sent .... So, here's the question .. is it just me? <g> I'd like the SSL connection, but .. as it works .. the real issue would be for the folks that do in fact have port 25 blocked by their ISP .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Checking before I go upstream .... ... So, here's the question .. is it just me? <g> I'd like the SSL connection, but .. as it works .. the real issue would be for the folks that do in fact have port 25 blocked by their ISP .... Port 587 works for me, but it is NOT SSL, which is likely your issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Port 587 works for me, but it is NOT SSL, which is likely your issue. OK .. thanks .. of all the things I checked/unchecked/etc. .... for future use; SSL on port 25 works fine SSL on port 587 does not work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.