barnford Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Hello I am receiving this error message every 3 to 4 reports. Confusingly, the refreshed page apparently shows that messages have been sent. Can't send report: smtpEnd: message transmission failed: 554 #5.3.0 Server Error Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt@fleetsoft.co.uk Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 I am having trouble reporting spam to spamcop today and receive the same error as the previous poster. In my case I am using my submit email address to send spam to and I get a failure notice email back: Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: 392-****[at]*************.co.uk Received: (qmail 17501 invoked for bounce); 19 May 2007 08:43:15 +0100 Date: 19 May 2007 08:43:15 +0100 From: MAILER-DAEMON[at]cactus.freezone.co.uk To: ****[at]*************..co.uk Subject: failure notice X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on cactus.freezone.co.uk X-spam-Level: * X-spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=6.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,INFO_TLD,NO_REAL_NAME, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at cactus.freezone.co.uk. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <submit.16_character_A/N[at]spam.spamcop.net>: 204.15.82.27 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 #5.3.0 Server Error --- Below this line is a copy of the message. The reverse DNS entry for 204.15.82.27 is given by http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?&ip=204.15.82.27 as vmx1.spamcop.net [moderator edit - "secret" submit address munged] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Betsy Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 This error is also being reported in the newsgroups. No 'official' word what the problem is. Miss Betsy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jongrose Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Same here. Getting the error when I use the 'Report this message as spam' function, not manual reporting. Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: spamcop-net-xxxx[at]spamcop.net Received: (qmail 17139 invoked from network); 19 May 2007 15:28:39 -0000 X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on blade6 X-spam-Level: ******* X-spam-Status: hits=7.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,NO_REAL_NAME, URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_SBL version=3.1.8 Received: from unknown (HELO c60.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.105) by blade6.cesmail.net with SMTP; 19 May 2007 15:28:39 -0000 Message-Id: <5sq8r0$e9kh9g[at]c60.cesmail.net> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,556,1170651600"; d="scan'208,217";a="479872304" Received: from mx53.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.53]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 19 May 2007 11:28:19 -0400 Received: (qmail 12719 invoked for bounce); 19 May 2007 15:28:19 -0000 Date: 19 May 2007 15:28:19 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON[at]mx53.cesmail.net To: xxxx[at]spamcop.net Subject: failure notice X-SpamCop-Checked: X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked SpamAssassin=7 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mx53.cesmail.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <ver.xxxx+spamcop.net-1179588497-119151a42e01349f9a447ace6f040775[at]spam.spamcop.net>: 204.15.82.27 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 #5.3.0 Server Error --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Same here. Getting the error when I use the 'Report this message as spam' function, not manual reporting. Has anyone contacted JT with their error messages? http://mail.spamcop.net/contact.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 From: Ellen <nobody[at]spamcop.net> Newsgroups: spamcop Subject: Re: SMTP error on reports Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 12:20:58 -0400 Organization: SpamCop NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Ed Thompson wrote: > > About every third report is currently failing with messages: > > > Can't send report: smtpEnd: message transmission failed: 554 #5.3.0 > Server Error <snip> [edit] > Server Error > Can't send report: smtpEnd: message transmission failed: 554 #5.3.0 > Server Error Operations is working the problem. Ellen SpamCop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewv Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 This is the Postfix error I reported to Don last night. No response yet. <quick.*********[at]spam.spamcop.net>: host vmx1.spamcop.net[204.15.82.27] said: 554 #5.3.0 Server Error (in reply to end of DATA command) It started yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 As Farelf reported, the 'only' official words on this is Ellen's post .. hours after this started being reported in the newsgroups. The issue is a connection problem between the Parsing & Reporting systems and the outgoing e-mail servers involved .. all these assets are IronPort owned, maintained systems. The way these things got handled in the past .... actual issue wil be resolved, errors go away, and everyone forgets that it happened .... the reality is that the IronPort folks will eventually generate an 'Engneering Report' that will get submitted through channels, received by folks that state "Engineering Reports are gobbeltygook" .. so the contents never get passed on the mere users .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Much in contrast to my remarks above; From: Ellen <nobody[at]spamcop.net> Newsgroups: spamcop Subject: Mailserver Issues Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:57:25 -0400 Message-ID: <f2nvcn$2ro$1[at]news.spamcop.net> The problems from earlier today/last night are now resolved and spam should be processing correctly. Ellen SpamCop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jongrose Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Yep, looks to be fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Yep, looks to be fixed.Ah, thanks jongrose - I was hoping someone would confirm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.