Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by salamandir

  1. i have been using spamcop.net as my primary email address for over 10 years... i never had any clue that they would suddenly decide to stop providing filtered email service, i've had to scramble like a madman to make everything sort of right again and it hasn't helped that forwarding hasn't been working the way it was supposed to... quite apart from changing my email address everywhere, there are some places, like paypal, that want to send a message to your email address of record before they are willing to change it. forwarding not working correctly made it even more of a nightmare... as i said in a previous message: cisco, you have made one long-time spamcop customer very angry and frustrated. i hope you're happy.
  2. some of the test messages i sent yesterday arrived this morning... no telling what happened to the rest of 'em... cisco, you have made one long-time spamcop customer very angry and frustrated. i hope you're happy. :angry:
  3. forwarding is not working... i set up forwarding when i first got the message, back in august. as of 140929 i was getting mail at spamcop.net as of 140930, no more mail for spamcop. i set up a new forwarding address, just to make sure. i got one message, the "Email Delivery Confirmation" from spamcop, and nothing else. just to make sure, i sent messages to spamcop.net from several other accounts, and i had a friend send mail to spamcop.net. none of those messages made it, and there were no bounce notices. it was as though they vanished into the ethernet. as far as i can tell, cisco has abandoned us... i have been a spamcop user for more than 10 years, and i find this incredibly irresponsible. :angry:
  4. :angry: i set up my forwarding address when i first got the message back in august... now that it's actually a done deal, i find that forwarding doesn't work. i've sent several emails from different accounts to salamandir at spamcop dot net and have received nothing... not a bounce notification, not a blocked notice... and no message on either end. for a service that has been so good for so long, spamcop has REALLY screwed up this time... is there any hope to get this working again, or should i just give up now, while i still have some semblance of civility left?
  5. i have sent several messages to salamandir at spamcop dot net over the past couple of days, and i can confirm that forwarding is not working. what do i do now? :angry:
  6. there was one, which i paid enough attention to, to set up a forward... but it may be that it doesn't work, because i haven't received any mail for salamandir at spamcop.net in a couple days... :angry: i, too, have been using spamcop for 10+ years... because there has been no other service like it. i signed up when i was a software tester at microsoft, and kept it through several job changes, a brain injury, and at least three different "real" email addresses, none of which anybody ever saw because of spamcop. having to give it up, suddenly, with no apparent warning, will definitely be a shock that it will take a while to overcome. and i hope that they get the forwarding worked out, because it appears as though it's not working as advertised... :angry:
  7. i'm more concerned about my false-positives being /dev/null'ed... i really need to know what's happening with these, because, while most of the messages that get labeled "spam" by SC really ARE spam, there have been enough occasions where a really important message from someone i know, who has made an unfortunate choice in email providers (or something like that), gets labeled "spam" and, if it weren't for the fact that i can scan held mail before reporting or deleting it, it would not get read at all. i really want to consider whether or not i want to continue using SC as my email address, if they are, in fact, going to blindly delete anything that gets filtered... is there an administrator, or someone who actually knows what is going on, who can look into this and report back? i'd appreciate it...
  8. so any false-positives received at spamcop.net (i.e. messages that appear to be spam, but really aren't) will automatically get deleted? that's not good... occasionally i get a false-positive... i have to mark it as "Forward and Whitelist Sender" before i actually receive it at my POP3 centurylink address (which nobody ever sees, because i have a spamcop.net address). i have used spamcop.net for 10 years, but if they're going to just delete anything that "appears to be spam" without allowing me to check, that may be enough to convince me to change my email address. seriously, it's a matter of getting a whole bunch of spam in order to weed out the false-positives, or have a few messages that are REALLY IMPORTANT get deleted by a system that won't let me weed out the false-positives... if spamcop is just going to start deleting things that appear to be spam, it may be time for me to abandon spamcop...
  9. so, what, exactly, is happening to my spamcop.net address? i logged in to spamcop this morning, as i have for 10 years previously, and i was not greeted with the familiar "Held Mail" page... and when i clicked the tab, the "Held Mail" tab was missing entirely. then i read the notice, and learned that CESmail is ceasing operations today... i remember getting a notice from spamcop, a few months ago, about this, and i think i even set up a forwarding address, like they suggested, but i didn't think this was going to happen... am i going to have to change email addresses, which i haven't done in more than a decade, or what?
  10. http://centralops.net/co/DomainDossier.aspx - DomainDossier gives me this whois for 126.com: inetnum: - netname: CHINANET-IDC-BJ country: CN descr: CHINANET Beijing province network descr: China Telecom descr: No.31,jingrong street descr: Beijing 100032 admin-c: CH93-AP tech-c: HC55-AP remarks: hostmaster is not for spam complaint, remarks: please send spam complaint to anti-spam[at]ns.chinanet.cn.net mnt-by: MAINT-CHINANET mnt-lower: MAINT-CHINATELECOM-BJ status: ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE changed: hostmaster[at]ns.chinanet.cn.net 20030620 changed: hm-changed[at]apnic.net 20050715 source: APNIC person: Chinanet Hostmaster nic-hdl: CH93-AP e-mail: anti-spam[at]ns.chinanet.cn.net address: No.31 ,jingrong street,beijing address: 100032 phone: +86-10-58501724 fax-no: +86-10-58501724 country: CN changed: dingsy[at]cndata.com 20070416 changed: zhengzm[at]gsta.com 20140227 mnt-by: MAINT-CHINANET source: APNIC person: Hostmaster of Beijing Telecom corporation CHINA TELECOM nic-hdl: HC55-AP e-mail: bjnic[at]bjtelecom.net address: Beijing Telecom address: No. 107 XiDan Beidajie, Xicheng District Beijing phone: +86-010-58503461 fax-no: +86-010-58503054 country: cn changed: bjnic[at]bjtelecom.net 20040115 mnt-by: MAINT-CHINATELECOM-BJ source: APNIC http://whois.domaintools.com/126.com - DomainTools gives me this, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT whois for 126.com: Domain Name: 126.com Registry Domain ID: 1373158_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.markmonitor.com Registrar URL: http://www.markmonitor.com Updated Date: 2014-05-15T20:31:52-0700 Creation Date: 1998-02-27T21:00:00-0800 Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2019-02-27T21:00:00-0800 Registrar: MarkMonitor, Inc. Registrar IANA ID: 292 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abusecomplaints[at]markmonitor.com Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2083895740 Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited Registry Registrant ID: Registrant Name: Matt Serlin Registrant Organization: DNStination Inc. Registrant Street: 425 Market St, 5th Floor Registrant City: San Francisco Registrant State/Province: CA Registrant Postal Code: 94105 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.4155319335 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.4155319336 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: admin[at]dnstinations.com Registry Admin ID: Admin Name: Matt Serlin Admin Organization: DNStination Inc. Admin Street: 425 Market St, 5th Floor Admin City: San Francisco Admin State/Province: CA Admin Postal Code: 94105 Admin Country: US Admin Phone: +1.4155319335 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: +1.4155319336 Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: admin[at]dnstinations.com Registry Tech ID: Tech Name: Matt Serlin Tech Organization: DNStination Inc. Tech Street: 425 Market St, 5th Floor Tech City: San Francisco Tech State/Province: CA Tech Postal Code: 94105 Tech Country: US Tech Phone: +1.4155319335 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: +1.4155319336 Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: admin[at]dnstinations.com Name Server: ns6.nease.net Name Server: ns8.nease.net Name Server: ns7.nease.net Name Server: ns5.nease.net Name Server: ns3.nease.net Name Server: ns1.nease.net Name Server: ns4.nease.net Name Server: ns2.nease.net so... which one should i believe?
  11. Why does this abuse address appear on whois, but doesn't even get reported at SC? - ( - APNIC SC-MY-IDC) here's another one: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5951067779zf...5d93fa5ae4139az whois identifies abuse[at]web.com but it doesn't even show up when spamcop parses... once again, i add it to the LART, and it doesn't show up... however, this time, it actually LARTed abuse[at]web.com, it just didn't bother to tell me about it... this seems like a bug to me...
  12. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5949478775z5...8421f2a33ff805z spamcop identifies abuso[at]guzzo.com.br but then says it's using "best contacts" and LARTs abuse[at]comdominio.com.br i add abuso[at]guzzo.com.br to the LART, but spamcop doesn't even devnull it... it reports to abuse[at]comdominio.com.br but not to abuso[at]guzzo.com.br... any clue why this is happening?
  13. http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/email_lookup/check-email.php can't verify aaarrrh[at]pirate.computer and i know it's a valid address, 'cause it's mine... that's fine, i don't like them, either... :angry:
  14. here's another one: sdo.рёъънбхважврб.рф which the parser renders: ----- Parsing input: sdo.рёъънбхважврб.рф Decimal ampersand decode: sdo.[at]QJJ=1E2062[at]1.[at]D No recent reports, no history available 1092://;/ is not a routeable IP address Cannot resolve 1092://;/ ----- in reality, its IP address is, and it has the following whois information according to DomainDossier: ----- % Information related to ' -' % Abuse contact for ' -' is 'noc[at]lugalink.net' inetnum: - netname: GLUBINA-NET descr: PP SKS-Lugan org: ORG-PS152-RIPE remarks: remarks: **********************************Attention*************************************** remarks: The pool is used other company ! remarks: In case of questions related to spam, HACKING, SECURITY remarks: Please contact directly abus[at]ealchevsk.org remarks: tel: +38 (044) 228-14-42; +38 (050) 472-06-34; +38 (067) 921-89-42 remarks: *********************************************************************************** remarks: country: UA admin-c: NASA-RIPE tech-c: DVC31-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PI mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT mnt-by: GLUBINA-MNT mnt-routes: GLUBINA-MNT mnt-domains: GLUBINA-MNT changed: hostmaster[at]ripe.net 20070921 changed: nsa[at]alchevsk.net 20130726 changed: hostmaster[at]ripe.net 20100319 changed: hostmaster[at]ripe.net 20130729 changed: hostmaster[at]ripe.net 20131001 source: RIPE organisation: ORG-PS152-RIPE org-name: PP SKS-LUGAN org-type: LIR address: PP SKS-LUGAN address: Lenina 42/6 address: 94207 address: Alchevsk address: UKRAINE phone: +380506492511 fax-no: +380644250006 abuse-c: AR17440-RIPE admin-c: TAU-RIPE mnt-ref: LUGAN-MNT mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT source: RIPE e-mail: lir[at]lugalink.net changed: bitbucket[at]ripe.net 20140305 person: Dmitrij Chaban address: Ukraine phone: +38 044 2281442 e-mail: jecky[at]vhoster.net nic-hdl: DVC31-RIPE mnt-by: VHOSTER-MNT changed: jecky[at]vhoster.net 20130723 source: RIPE person: Novohatsky Sergey address: Ukraine mnt-by: NASA-MNT phone: +380 6442 50006 e-mail: nsa[at]alchevsk.net notify: nsa[at]alchevsk.net nic-hdl: NASA-RIPE changed: nsa[at]alchevsk.net 20131009 source: RIPE % Information related to '' route: descr: PP "SKS-Lugan" origin: AS35804 mnt-by: GLUBINA-MNT changed: patrocl[at]gmail.com 20071126 changed: tugik[at]alchevsk.net 20130924 source: RIPE % This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.75 (DB-1) ----- abuse[at]alchevsk.net is denied when i add it to spamcop's LART. i have not tried a manual LART yet.
  15. when i have LARTed abuse[at]leaseweb.de and certbund[at]bsi.bund.de in the past, it has bounced. i currently have the following in the To: line: technical[at]leaseweb.com, abusedeskl[at]easeweb.com, abuse[at]leaseweb.com, abuse[at]leaseweb.nl, abuse[at]eu.level3.net, cert[at]ncsc.nl
  16. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5944506286zd...fd95f8feebcd83z another instance of leaseweb.de being responsible, but "nothing to do"... i haven't seen one of these in a couple of months, but they're definitely still out there...
  17. another unicode domain that breaks the parser: йттът.аоÑк.рф parser response: Parsing input: йттът.аоÑк.рф Decimal ampersand decode: 9BBJB.0>A:.[at]D No recent reports, no history available 1092://;/ is not a routeable IP address Cannot resolve 1092://;/ if i paste йттът.аоÑк.рф into the address bar of my browser, it immediately goes to "Dr. MaxMan - Max Penis Enlarger Pills!" but i can't report it, because 1092://;/ is not a routable address... 8/ what do i do now?
  18. i am experiencing a similar problem with parsing нкла.рф - http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrac...rtid=6164555900 - which appears in the parser as ýúûð.рф i have found that нкла.рф -- or xn--80atdg.xn--p1ai -- is hosted at but the spamcop parser won't even attempt it. is there some work around for this problem, or should i continue to LART these manually?
  19. so, does anybody have a clue when it will be fixed? i've got spam that needs to be reported and it's piling up...
  20. i have been getting errors this morning, instead of spam reports: ----- [an error occurred while processing this directive] ----- 500 Internal Server Error - Sorry, your request could not be processed. ---- is anybody else experiencing this?
  21. yes. when it said "Reports disabled for abuse[at]leaseweb.de... Nothing to do." i copied it and pasted it here. if it had said something else, i would have pasted something different. and i don't get "Nothing to do." all the time, just some of the time. when i don't get it, i let spamcop do the reporting. when i do get it, that's when i LART manually.
  22. if i can log in, but i can't get to the held email, i can't report it. it has nothing to do with my account, because of the fact that i can log in... that was all i needed to know. thanks.
  23. Cannot connect to imap server: Connection refused i get this message when i log in and check my held email. when i try to login to webmail.spamcop.net i get a "can't establish a connection to the server at webmail.spamcop.net." message. i'm able to report spam as usual from www.spamcop.net. it has been that way all day, as far as i can tell... is there something known wrong?
  24. i don't have to send LARTs myself all the time, just some of the time... frequently i get an email that i can send from spamcop without any problem, but sometimes i get "Reports disabled for abuse[at]leaseweb.de... Nothing to do." instead, and these have been the ones that i'm LARTing manually. occasionally, i get a response from security.feedback [at] level3.com or abusedesk [at] leaseweb.com that says they're looking into it, but nothing else ever happens, and i continue to get spam from leaseweb about which spamcop tells me there's nothing to do... i would really like to find an email address to which i can send LARTs that will get the job done, rather than assuring me they're on the job, and then go back to sleep...
  • Create New...