[Resolved] Using inetadmin#alestra.net.mx[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

[JoeColorado]

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?track=148.244.117.10

Parsing input: 148.244.117.10

[report history]

Routing details for 148.244.117.10

inetadmin[at]alestra.net.mx bounces (5 sent : 6 bounces)

Using inetadmin#alestra.net.mx[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

Report routing for 148.244.117.10: inetadmin#alestra.net.mx[at]devnull.spamcop.net

Statistics:

148.244.117.10 not listed in bl.spamcop.net

More Information..

148.244.117.10 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org ( 127.0.0.8 )

148.244.117.10 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org ( 127.0.0.9 )

148.244.117.10 listed in cbl.abuseat.org ( 127.0.0.2 )

No valid email addresses found, sorry!

For reasons I don't understand (but am guessing that this IP is part of an IP range that had its contact address "hard coded" by an admin at one time):

There is no Refresh link available.

But:

% LACNIC resource: whois.lacnic.net


% Copyright LACNIC lacnic.net
%  The data below is provided for information purposes
%  and to assist persons in obtaining information about or
%  related to AS and IP numbers registrations
%  By submitting a whois query, you agree to use this data
%  only for lawful purposes.
%  2012-04-04 12:42:39 (BRT -03:00)

inetnum:	 148.244.117.0/26
status:	  reassigned
owner:	   Herramientas y sist. Computo, S.A.
ownerid:	 MX-HYSC1-LACNIC
responsible: Adolfo Escobedo
address:	 Priv. 8Nte. Col. Guadalupe Caleras Puebla, Puebla 72100, 111, 
address:	 00000 - No info - ME
country:	 MX
phone:	   +52  1111111111 []
owner-c:	 ADE3
tech-c:	  ADE3
abuse-c:	 ADE3
created:	 20011122
changed:	 20110611
inetnum-up:  148.244/16

nic-hdl:	 ADE3
person:	  Adolfo Escobedo
e-mail:	  admin2[at]ALESTRA.NET.MX
address:	 Herramientas y sist. Computo, S.A. Priv. 8Nte. Col. Guadalupe Caleras Puebla, Puebla 72100, 111, 
address:	 00000 - Ciudad - ME
country:	 MX
phone:	   +52  22247569 []
created:	 20110611
changed:	 20110611

% whois.lacnic.net accepts only direct match queries.
% Types of queries are: POCs, ownerid, CIDR blocks, IP
% and AS numbers.

Notes:

1. The owner, tech and abuse contacts are all the same, ADE3:

owner-c: ADE3

tech-c: ADE3

abuse-c: ADE3

2. ADE3 is admin2[at]ALESTRA.NET.MX:

nic-hdl: ADE3

person: Adolfo Escobedo

e-mail: admin2[at]ALESTRA.NET.MX

3. Abuse.net says the correct abuse reporting address for ALESTRA.NET.MX is abuse[at]att.net.mx. Shouldn't that address be used? As I understand it, if whatever it is that is preventing the contact information for this IP to be refreshed was removed such that a refresh could be performed, then when SC found admin2[at]ALESTRA.NET.MX as the abuse contact it would then lookup ALESTRA.NET.MX at abuse.net and retrieve abuse[at]att.net.mx.

http://abuse.net/lookup.phtml?domain=ALESTRA.NET.MX

abuse[at]att.net.mx

Thanks!

[SpamCopAdmin]

Fixed!

Thanks!

- Don D'Minion - SpamCop Admin -

- service[at]admin.spamcop.net -