vilain Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 I'm getting on the order of 5-10 emails a day from various domains, all hosted by scaleableDNS. I report them via the reporting web site. The spammer's content is always OVH which does nothing to stop spamming. So I let that go. But I send complaints directly to abuse[at]scaleabledns.com with my email scrubbed out of the spam. They reply back that they've disabled that account, but the domain pops up again with 24 hours from a different IP address. Is there a list of upstream providers for ScalableDNS. If I traceroute, I see above.net and I wonder how receptive they'd be to a complaint of a downstream customer who harbors spammers. I think they're making money off the cancellation fees. The address that responds is abuse[at]enzu.com. Anyone know who their upstream providers are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patti2 Posted May 26, 2014 Share Posted May 26, 2014 I'm getting on the order of 5-10 emails a day from various domains, all hosted by scaleableDNS. I report them via the reporting web site. The spammer's content is always OVH which does nothing to stop spamming. So I let that go. But I send complaints directly to abuse[at]scaleabledns.com with my email scrubbed out of the spam. They reply back that they've disabled that account, but the domain pops up again with 24 hours from a different IP address. Is there a list of upstream providers for ScalableDNS. If I traceroute, I see above.net and I wonder how receptive they'd be to a complaint of a downstream customer who harbors spammers. I think they're making money off the cancellation fees. The address that responds is abuse[at]enzu.com. Anyone know who their upstream providers are? Here are their peerings: http://bgp.he.net/AS18978#_peers For me, the upstream providers were nLayer (AS4436) and AboveNET (AS6461) Abuse emails: abuse[at]above.net; abuse[at]gtt.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.