Jump to content

Parsing error or my newbie inexperience?


Lance

Recommended Posts

Posted

On occasion I think Spamcop mis-identifies the originating email. Here's an example:

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1331714565zd...150c858a619166z

In this example Spamcop believes the email originated from 68.181.x.x

Now I can manually look at the Received headers and I think the email originated from 151.134.x.x or maybe 124.120.x.x. I can't see what's so special about them that the Spamcop parser would ignore these.

Can someone enlighten me why this is so?

Lance

*****

Posted

You are reading the headers backwards most likely. New received headers are added at the TOP of the message. So the last received before you got it was:

Received: from msg-mx0.usc.edu ([128.125.137.5]) by vsoeexch.vsoe.usc.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);

Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:18:16 -0700

This is obviously an internal handoff within the usc.edu system, it is skipped because it is listed with spamcop as a trusted relay, so spamcop moves onto the next received line.

Received: from almaak-01.usc.edu ([68.181.201.1])

by msg-mx0.usc.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5

2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJX001QYX60A6D0[at]msg-mx0.usc.edu> for x

(ORCPT x); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:19:00 -0700 (PDT)

Again, this appears to be an internal handoff within the usc.edu system, however since this server is NOT listed as a trusted relay, spamcop takes it as the originating IP address since it can't reliably parse any further.

Most likely, doing a mailhost probe will pick up this server and add it to your mailhost list so that spamcop can parse beyond this result.

Posted

<snip>

Again, this appears to be an internal handoff within the usc.edu system, however since this server is NOT listed as a trusted relay, spamcop takes it as the originating IP address since it can't reliably parse any further.

Most likely, doing a mailhost probe will pick up this server and add it to your mailhost list so that spamcop can parse beyond this result.

I think I got it. Thanks Telarin.

Lance

*****

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...