ob1db Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 I noticed this response from the system: Report spam to: Re: 22.214.171.124 (Administrator of network where email originates) To: nomaster[at]devnull.spamcop.net (Notes) which I ordinarily would just shrug and ignore. When I happened to double-check the IP, I see this: Parsing input: 126.96.36.199 [report history] Routing details for 188.8.131.52 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 184.108.40.206 : jasone[at]sectorlink.com Reports disabled for abuse[at]sectorlink.com Using best contacts host 220.127.116.11 = 65-163-15-194.servdns.com (cached) Host 65-163-15-194.servdns.com (checking ip) IP not found ; 65-163-15-194.servdns.com discarded as fake. No reporting addresses found for 18.104.22.168, using devnull for tracking. Curious as to why the known contact at sectorlink isn't used, I ran the IP through deadbeef.com, which I find turns up contact info on a lot of websites that Spamcop can't. I got: Lookup results for 22.214.171.124 [at] whois.deadbeef.com abuse[at]sprint.net - ARIN abuse contact for netblock containing 126.96.36.199 I am wondering why deadbeef gets a seemingly valid abuse contact when SC isn't! David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.