ahoier Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 The following tracking URL gave me a error, no source IP headers found: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1654814214za...c369eb855ae098z But, to me, it looks like it is/was sent from a gmail account, to my gmail account. I retrieved the full headers from Gmail's "Show Original" - unless this is another case of the spammers mangling the headers...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turetzsr Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 ...If I remember correctly, intra-provider spam (for example, spam from one GMail user to another) is expected to be handled directly with the provider, not through SpamCop. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable will happen along and explain why this is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rconner Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 ...If I remember correctly, intra-provider spam (for example, spam from one GMail user to another) is expected to be handled directly with the provider, not through SpamCop. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable will happen along and explain why this is the case. The IPs are indeed in 10.x.x.x, which makes them unrouteable (and unreportable via SpamCop). However, Google has a page (https://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=29381) that would appear to be tailor-made for this sort of thing. -- rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahoier Posted February 14, 2008 Author Share Posted February 14, 2008 The IPs are indeed in 10.x.x.x, which makes them unrouteable (and unreportable via SpamCop). However, Google has a page (https://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=29381) that would appear to be tailor-made for this sort of thing. -- rick Alrighty, thanks for the prompt response Actually, upon doing my own research, https://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer...amp;topic=12852 may work a lot better, since it files a complaint against the user as a separate process. It wouldn't be possible for the parser to include a note of this, would it....? hehe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.