The primary mode of support here is peer-to-peer, meaning users helping other users. (please remember this at all times!)
Another try:
This forum is composed of people who have used spamcop and those who are learning about anti-spam efforts.
![]() ![]() |
| Jeff G. |
Jan 30 2004, 08:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
T-shirt wearing out Group: Membersph Posts: 3730 Joined: 2-July 04 From: Northeast New Jersey (New York Metro Area), USA ... Please read my sig. :) Member No.: 2041 |
I would like a capability of using new Whitelists in the following ways:
1. "email filtering whitelist", on a checkmark basis (like the IP Based email filtering blacklists). This would include: IronPort's various Bonded Sender lists; country-based lists (for example, EU countries for those EU users interested in suing for EU spam) from services.net, rbl.cluecentral.net, and blackholes.us; and others as they become available. I personally would only check the box for IronPort's Bonded Sender Plus. 2. "personal domain whitelist" would be the new name of the current "personal whitelist", on a new "personal whitelists" page. It would continue to use the current rules, matching from the right side of the "From" or "Sender" field, including matching beyond the @ sign. Attempts to report spam from domains on this list would be defaulted off by the reporting system, and challenged with a confirmation dialog in interactive mode. 3. "personal ip whitelist" would keep us from reporting our own mailservers from Held Mail, which has been happening to more and more people recently. It would also be on a new "personal whitelists" page. Attempts to report IP Addresses on this list would be defaulted off by the reporting system, and challenged with a confirmation dialog in interactive mode. 4. "personal localpart whitelist" would keep us from reporting messages from various RFC2142-compliant addresses, like Postmaster and Abuse, plus MAILER-DAEMON and <>, on a proactive basis. It would also be on a new "personal whitelists" page. It would match from the left side of the "From" or "Sender" field, including matching beyond the @ sign. Attempts to report spam from localparts on this list would be defaulted off by the reporting system, and challenged with a confirmation dialog in interactive mode. Of course, these would need to be countered by "personal blacklists", including "personal domain blacklist", "personal ip blacklist", and "personal localpart blacklist". Also, precedence rules would be that a more specific (longer) listing has more weight than a less specific (shorter) listing, and in case of a tie, white has more weight than black. What do you think? -------------------- Best Regards, Jeff G. (full signature)
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 07:09 AM |