Jump to content

Jeff G.

Membersph
  • Posts

    3,727
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jeff G.

  1. Interestingly enough, http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnstime.ch?n....com&type=A currently says "Searching for systms.com A record at J.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. Reports no A records (NXDOMAIN). 208ms." and "Sorry, I could not continue.", my local tools cannot find domain systms.com in DNS, and http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1098619467z7...7cd9b7b6bddfc7z is now showing "Host systms.com (checking ip) IP not found ; systms.com discarded as fake." and "Cannot resolve http://systms.com/online/www.rightreasons....ndex.html". Ask your ISP why you can resolve systms.com, possibly including results of a dig or nslookup command sent to your ISP's nameservers. OTOH, consider that eNom still has systms.com registered, and eNom's nameservers like dns1.name-services.com are still returning results as follows when queried with dig:
  2. Please see my new additional suggestion at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...t&pid=48998
  3. It's now time to add to this request similar OCR scanning for SpamCop Email System Customers before SpamAssassin, so that SpamAssassin (and perhaps later content filtering apps) can read and recognize all the P&D buzzwords, and score accordingly. Keywords: Optical Character Recognition Pump&Dump Pump and Dump
  4. That's a fine workaround, but the part of the page that is supposed to actually DISPLAY the link to http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=10 or http://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=sho...y&offset=10 or http://mailsc.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=show...y&offset=10 is still missing, and therefore broken. And no, there is no link to http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=20 on http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=10 either (for example).
  5. You might then be interested in http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=1367 or perhaps one of the other projects on http://thescambaiter.com/antispam/
  6. Some servers can, they issue a 500-series error message for the dot (that terminates DATA).
  7. Do you mean 195.7.97.106 or a different one? No, it wasn't. It may have been listed by the SCBL, but the SCBL is a "Blocking List", not a "black list". You may or may not (probably not, in the case of email to spamtraps). After you have read the "Why am I Blocked" FAQ. Current evidence suggests that the reason why is for sending mail to spamtraps, probably UUBE. What reason(s) was/were listed yesterday on http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&...ip=195.7.97.106? Because 24 hours passed after the last infraction. That's how the SCBL works. You'd have found that out if you'd read the SCBL FAQ. You're welcome.
  8. I parsed your example with a non-Mailhosted account, resulting in Tracking URL http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1097698991z9...be2dfc7dd0c4fcz, which gave me the following: What Tracking URL did you try to use?
  9. The feature you mentioned, although titled "Report History", is more properly called the "View recent reports" feature, which can be accessed via the "View recent reports" Link on the "Past Reports" Tab, or directly via http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory, http://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory, or http://mailsc.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory (depending on which site you're using). My account is experiencing the same symptom, in that only the first page shows up, and there is no link available for viewing subsequent pages (of older Reports). More specifically, there is absolutely nothing but a newline between the last 'No reports filed</div>' and '<div id="footer">'. I have just emailed a SpamCop Admin via service[at]admin.spamcop.net to look into this issue for us.
  10. No, but that's been preventing notifications to you and/or your admins of problems. OK, here's one: stop sending UUBE.
  11. In my case (using OE6), it is recording the machine name, which I understand OE6 typically uses in its HELO greeting. And I couldn't get OE6's SSL to work with it. Other than that, it works just great!
  12. BTW, please be aware of the info on http://www.enom.com/domains/whois.asp?Doma...amp;submit.y=13 and http://www.whitepages.com/10866/search/Rev...hone=7704320779 .
  13. As soon as you change something and click the "Modify" Button bringing you to https://webmail.spamcop.net/horde/imp/spamc....php?modified=1 or http://webmail.spamcop.net/horde/imp/spamc....php?modified=1, the SpamCop Email System should start POPping your email, or throwing an Error. It should take no more than 15 minutes. You did configure your Gmail account to allow you to POP from it, right?
  14. That's great, but please make sure that you still implement all of the aliases required of you by RFC2142.
  15. Unfortunately, it looks like you might not be getting any email whatsoever because server mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk doesn't exist - see the following for details:
  16. mail.internode.on.net (203.16.214.182) has the following recent Report History (it shouldn't be sending bounces entitled "Returned mail: see transcript for details"): Submitted: Sunday 2006/10/08 11:34:59 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1957171426 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 18:31:31 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1954684771 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 05:11:51 -0400: =?windows-1251?B?w+7r7uLt7uzzIOHz9ePg6/Ll8PM=?= 1953683393 ( 203.16.214.182 ) To: aunic[at]internode.com.au 1953683387 ( 150.101.155.102 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1953683377 ( 150.101.155.102 ) To: abuse[at]internode.on.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 01:27:56 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1953425241 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 18:36:32 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1953020993 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Monday 2006/10/02 02:05:54 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1947192429 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/09/26 23:20:32 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1939973887 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/09/26 09:55:05 -0400: =?iso-8859-1?B?oVKturOhpUjDuKW7pOKqa7rrpN/DuLtzqrq1tK3brk2u0SAsumHA8rdz?= =?i... 1939122998 ( 203.16.214.182 ) To: aunic[at]internode.com.au 1939122951 ( 203.122.240.116 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1939122892 ( 203.122.240.116 ) To: abuse[at]internode.on.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/09/22 02:22:36 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1932973466 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ---------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/09/20 15:49:39 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1930617626 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
  17. More Report History follows (each of the 13964 domains controlled by MCI/UUNet/Worldcom per http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddr...ng=142.77.1.111 needs to be checked for bouncing ("Undeliverable mail:") and for delayed mail warnings ("WARNING. Mail Delayed:")): Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 23:29:46 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: High-quality medications here. 1956418024 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 04:28:31 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: vvatch this st-0ck Trade 1955242165 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 07:28:23 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: Re: Home Loan - APPROVED. - 12Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:56:0... 1953831594 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 09:28:30 -0400: Undeliverable mail: this is how I got thin 1952353510 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Monday 2006/10/02 09:28:25 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: Solid Loans with options. 1947636416 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Sunday 2006/10/01 16:28:59 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: this is how I got thin 1946704317 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
  18. Please keep in mind that the limits of 50,000 bytes per Submitted spam and 100,000 bytes per Submission Email are still in effect.
  19. Sorry, that doesn't work any more for regular Reports, and I'm not sure if it ever did for Quick Reports. Please see my most recent Post on the subject of "Personal copies of outgoing reports".
  20. Certainly, old SpamCop Email System Customers have been permitted to use Quick Reporting without Mailhosts, until circumstances forced them to implement Mailhosts.
  21. That last bit should be: contact the deputies via deputies[at]spamcop.net and include "Mailhosts" in the Subject.
  22. More recent Report History follows (you should be accepting and acting on UUBE Reports, rather than opting not to receive them): Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 18:58:23 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1956179132 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 18:57:18 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1956177981 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 04:56:21 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1955272751 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 02:02:14 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1955090106 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 22:17:21 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954881195 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 21:29:03 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954837468 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 18:47:49 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954696702 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 15:03:08 -0400: REQUEST TO BE OUR COMPANY'S PAYMENT AGENT IN YOUR REGION 1954459122 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 12:13:41 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954233714 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 21:52:53 -0400: spam: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ATTN: YOU WON =A31.5M (CLAIM IT NOW).?= 1954456583 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1954456574 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 09:02:03 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953960092 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 08:37:16 -0400: MYSTERY SHOPPER WANTED EARN NO LESS THAN $ 500.00 1953925654 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 07:49:41 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953862577 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 00:55:52 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953393459 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 17:46:15 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1952968721 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 16:26:44 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1952881542 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 23:29:04 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1951737240 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 16:24:05 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1951332937 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 07:34:17 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950600067 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 03:05:59 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950309905 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 00:39:22 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950149440 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 20:54:58 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1949945431 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 07:14:31 -0400: NOTIFICA DEL PREMIO:CONGRATULAZIONI!!! 1948963158 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1948963153 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 07:04:11 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1948949337 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
  23. Yes, a spammer can easily use bcc. Most do, and you'll maybe get a "bcc: undisclosed-recipients" if you're lucky. OTOH, some spam programs will just send "to:" a whole lot of recipients (and some badly-configured programs will send "bcc:" a whole lot of recipients, defeating the "blind" in "blind carbon copy"), in which case by default most email client programs will only show a limited number of those recipients by virtue of their design (need to save room on the screen for the other display elements).
  24. Yes, you should definitely start using Mailhosts, if you haven't already, or you may end up Reporting Gmail rather than the actual perpetrator. Here follows a snippet from an email from SpamCop Admin on the subject:
×
×
  • Create New...