cwg Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Parse: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z4224378412z0...958273849b5aafz ----- Tracking message source: 84.246.229.67: Display data: "whois 84.246.229.67[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) Lookup bh1182-ripe[at]whois.ripe.net Display data: "whois bh1182-ripe[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) bh1182-ripe = whois.ripe.net 84.246.229.67 (nothing found) No reporting addresses found for 84.246.229.67, using devnull for tracking. whois.ripe.net 84.246.229.67 -B % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf % Information related to '84.246.227.0 - 84.246.230.255' inetnum: 84.246.227.0 - 84.246.230.255 netname: ELBMULTIMEDIA2 descr: netissime country: FR admin-c: BH1182-RIPE tech-c: BH1182-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: ELB-MNT mnt-lower: ELB-MNT mnt-routes: ELB-MNT changed: ws[at]comalis.com 20081113 source: RIPE person: Boulahbel hichem address: 17 rue jean bourgey Villeurbanne 69100 phone: +33437430037 nic-hdl: Bh1182-RIPE changed: bh[at]netissime.com 20041027 source: RIPE % Information related to '84.246.224.0/21AS34274' route: 84.246.224.0/21 descr: Routage ELB MULTIMEDIA HOSTING origin: AS34274 mnt-by: elb-mnt changed: bh[at]netissime.com 20050311 source: RIPE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpamCopAdmin Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 If you would provide a working abuse address in your posts, we would have something. As it is, they're just wasted posts. - Don D'Minion - SpamCop Admin - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwg Posted July 9, 2010 Author Share Posted July 9, 2010 As is, unless I find out otherwise, I'd use bh[at]netissime.com as the sole address available from the lookup for reporting abuse to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbat Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 As would I, but after some digging around at RIPE¹, I can see why SpamCop is reluctant: http://www.ripe.net/info/faq/abuse/using_whois.html Do not use the email address in the "changed" line of the RIPE Database object. Look for abuse email addresses in the "remarks" field, or use the email address from the "tech-c" or "admin-c".(they also refer to an optional 'abusemailbox' field here) The only e-mail address listed for BH1182-RIPE is in a "changed" line. ¹ I wanted to know what is the purpose of the -B flag (why hide details if you can show them with a switch) - didn't find anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbat Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 There was a proposal in 2006 to add the following to a RIPE policy document: Registration data (range, contact information, status etc.) must be correct at all times (i.e. they have to be maintained). Every organisation controlling an IP address should provide at least one working contact e-mail address where notifications of abuse emanating from that IP address can be sent.It was withdrawn as not enough consensus was reached. Also some discussion in 2008 but no action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.