Jump to content

StevenUnderwood

Membersph
  • Posts

    5,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StevenUnderwood

  1. I know you can untick specific addresses, but surely anything [at]gmail.com or [at]hotmail.com or [at]geocities.com that isn't abuse[at] or postmaster[at] is fake, the parser should be smart enough to discard anything that is obviously fake.

    Not true, anyone can use one of these addresses to register their domain, sometimes for legitimate reasons (If my domain is expired, how will I get email to account[at]mydomain if that is my only email account?) And spamcop does go as far as the registration info to find reporting addresses.

    Searching for specific strings (daffyduck) would be a terible procedure to start doing just for the overall speed of the parsing.

  2. I think it's time spamcop updated the personal whitelist manager to become more user-friendly.

    I have 51 pages in my personal whitelist, with only 15 people on each page. I should be allowed to specify how many entries are displayed on each page.

    When I delete an entry, it always returns me to the first page. It should reload the last page from which I deleted the entry.

    There should be a fast way to jump straight to a desired page, without editing the URL in the addrss box.

    This has been asked for several times, the last only 5 threads down... this should be moved to that thread. http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3734

    It would be nice to change it, but there does not appear to be much work being done on changes right now... only increased disk space, etc.

  3. Recently I got in a hurry and didn't pay attention to what I was doing and whitelisted & released a bunch of spam from my held mail folder. I'm slowly deleting the bad whitelist entries, but it would be nice if ...

    You are not the first person to ask this. There is likely a thread in the New Features but I was unable to locate one immediately. A moderator will likely move this thread into that group, possibly into an appropriate thread.

    That being said, I'm not sure how much of the whitelist capability is home built and how much uses IMP (the webmail application).

  4. Well, I am paying for the service, and I think it's only common courtesy to let us know whether this is going to be fixed, and if not, why not.

    36165[/snapback]

    I am a paying customer of the Email service which gets me an included reporting account. Having been here for several years now, do not hold your breath waiting "to let us know whether this is going to be fixed, and if not, why not." In general, you will know if it has been fixed when it starts working differently.
  5. Per a posting found at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5250 ...

    To be honest, I've read this a number of times and am not sure I see what "the change" is ... beyond a different type of 'warning/request" ...??? just passing it on ....

    35104[/snapback]

    I agree...maybe they got a complaint about the warning and decided to pop up a "are you really sure". ;)

    Glad to see we are not the only ones who have trouble with people reading what we write.

  6. However, spamcop doens't seem to filter them out, I keep getting them even though I thought they were in my blacklist.

    33071[/snapback]

    Is this the spamcop email system you are trying to filter them with or some other system?

    If it is spamcop and you post a tracking URL, we should be able to help you create the blacklist entry. Reporting does not add to your blacklist.

    People have different opinions about reporting things you signed up for and later tried to cancel. Your single report vs. the number of valid messages being sent will probably never get the IP listed on spamcop, but it might catch the attention of someone there who can help.

×
×
  • Create New...