Jump to content

cwg

Membera
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cwg

  1. On 1/22/2022 at 4:50 PM, gnarlymarley said:

    In the IPv4 world, the bottom, 0, should be the network address and the top, 255, is the broadcast address.  It is using a devnull, but seems like it may be a trap.

    That's from how I file IP address's in a workbook that I use to keep track of spammers, to avoid entering each (a.b.c.d) D in the workbook, I set it to 0.

    There's over 18,000 entries in the book, including abuse address's, if any.

  2. % [whois.apnic.net]
    % Whois data copyright terms    http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
    % Information related to '203.245.32.0 - 203.245.63.255'
    % Abuse contact for '203.245.32.0 - 203.245.63.255' is 'irt@nic.or.kr'
    
     
    inetnum: 203.245.32.0 - 203.245.63.255
    netname: KORNET
    descr: Korea Telecom
    admin-c: IM667-AP
    tech-c: IM667-AP
    country: KR
    status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE
    mnt-by: MNT-KRNIC-AP
    mnt-irt: IRT-KRNIC-KR
    last-modified: 2017-02-06T01:15:18Z
    source: APNIC
  3. In the meantime even a local IPv6 address prevents parsing - would it not be appropriate to ignore any purely local IPv6 and complete the parsing based on the public IPv4 address? I have just failed to report a spam of this type.

    I agree, especially considering there is no public IPv6 address's, everything has to come through an IPv4 gateway someplace.

×
×
  • Create New...