Neil Parks Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 Please look at http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5458084753z8...fefa396f939e37z Parsing header: 0: Received: from ri1.zoner.com ([217.198.113.91]) by inMail24.com (IceWarp 9.1.5-7) with SMTP id NOI33752; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:52 +0100 Hostname verified: ri1.zoner.com inmail24 received mail from inmail24 ( 217.198.113.91 ) 1: Received: from ri1.zoner.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15B38004861; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:39 x (CET) Internal handoff at inmail24 2: Received: from a1modem (178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at [178.191.148.197]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBD510003141; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:38 x (CET) Hostname verified: 178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at inmail24 received mail from sending system 178.191.148.197 Can't parse date of spam for age detection: Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:38 x Please notice that the letter x has been inserted into the dates in the Received records. This is how the same Received records appear in the original spam as I received it: Received: from ri1.zoner.com ([217.198.113.91]) by inMail24.com (IceWarp 9.1.5-7) with SMTP id NOI33752; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:52 +0100 Received: from ri1.zoner.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15B38004861; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from a1modem (178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at [178.191.148.197]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBD510003141; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:38 +0100 (CET) The original spam also contained this Cc record: Cc: <peakspeed19[at]inmail24.com>, <peter_ho[at]inmail24.com>;, Mon[at]ri1.zoner.com, 28[at]ri1.zoner.com, Jan[at]ri1.zoner.com, 2013[at]ri1.zoner.com, "14:58:39"[at]ri1.zoner.com, +0100[at]ri1.zoner.com Notice that the apparent addresses in the "n1.zoner.com" domain are actually components of the date and time! To test whether this Cc record was affecting the Spamcop process, I resubmitted the spam with that one record--and ONLY that one record--removed. The result can be found in: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5458098409z5...f75cd686396f64z This second submission was processed and reported successfully.
turetzsr Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 Hi, Neil, ...Sorry to hear of your problem. Smarter people than I may happen by here with some help but if that doesn't happen in a timely enough manner for you, I would suggest that you contact the SpamCop deputies directly at e-mail address deputies[at]admin.spamcop.net. ...Good luck and thank you for reporting spam.
Neil Parks Posted February 1, 2013 Author Posted February 1, 2013 I may have inadvertently posted this to the wrong forum: http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=13113
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.