shmengie Posted February 27, 2005 Posted February 27, 2005 I noticed the tag in http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z736926310zfa...c3cac24cf72067z <a href="http://%61%6c%6c%73%6f%66%74%73%2e%6e%65%74" target="_blank"> Does not seem to be recognized by SC as an URL http://allsofts.net Name: allsofts.net Address: 195.47.196.142 Thunderbird displayed the URL properly rendered, yet my reporting software didn't lidentify it until I added some more code... Took me a while to decrypt it. Maybe you will appreciate this Python code which is capable of locating and decoding these refrences. http2 = re.compile(r'''(?<!src\=)(?<!src\=['"])(?<!src\=3d['"])(?P<url>http\:[/]*(?:%[0-9|a-f]{2,2})+)(?!'></a>)(?!"></a>)(?!></a>)''', re.IGNORECASE) http2refs = http2.findall(clip) percents = re.compile(r'(%[0-9|a-f]{2,2})') for i in range(len(http2refs)): for digi in percents.findall(http2refs[i]): http2refs[i]=http2refs[i].replace(digi,-hacker-string.atoi(digi[1:],16))) HReferences += http2refs
Wazoo Posted February 27, 2005 Posted February 27, 2005 Seen in the details listed in the output provided by your Tracking URL; Resolving link obfuscation http://%61%6c%6c%73%6f%66%74%73%2e%6e%65%74 Percent unescape: http://allsofts.net host allsofts.net (checking ip) = 195.47.196.142 host 195.47.196.142 (getting name) no name host allsofts.net (checking ip) = 195.47.196.142 host 195.47.196.142 (getting name) no name Tracking link: http://allsofts.net [report history] Resolves to 195.47.196.142 Routing details for 195.47.196.142 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 195.47.196.142 : abuse[at]nik.ru Using abuse net on abuse[at]nik.ru abuse net nik.ru = abuse[at]relcom.net, postmaster[at]nik.ru, al[at]ne.ru, abuse[at]nik.ru Using best contacts abuse[at]relcom.net postmaster[at]nik.ru al[at]ne.ru abuse[at]nik.ru abuse[at]relcom.net bounces (7 sent : 6 bounces) Using abuse#relcom.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking. postmaster[at]nik.ru bounces (406 sent : 231 bounces) Using postmaster#nik.ru[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking. Looks to me like it parsed just fine ... just another ISP that cares not about their spew.
shmengie Posted February 27, 2005 Author Posted February 27, 2005 DOH! My bad... Thought I looked and it didn't.
shmengie Posted February 27, 2005 Author Posted February 27, 2005 Well, here's one that SC didn't find! <br> Web Site: www vinobleinc com<br> <br> Although, I don't see this URL being worthy a feture request... I hunted it down by hand. I figure if I keep posting on this thread, I'll seem totally insane or a genius
Wazoo Posted February 28, 2005 Posted February 28, 2005 Web Site: www vinobleinc com Soeey .. no Tracking URL provided to look at logic used .... but on the other hand, how can you even begin to consider this as a valid URL? What you have provided is nothing more than a set of three blocks of characters.
shmengie Posted February 28, 2005 Author Posted February 28, 2005 Soeey .. no Tracking URL provided to look at logic used .... but on the other hand, how can you even begin to consider this as a valid URL? What you have provided is nothing more than a set of three blocks of characters. 24884[/snapback] I hope you percievied my intention of humor in the previous post. That quote quote Url quote quote did come in a spam. I don't understand why the spammer did that. Guess most ppl wouldn't even have seen it. I only saw it cuz I looked at the source. It wasn't visible in the Thunderbird rendered e-mail. I only posted it here cuz you cought me beeing a goof at the beginning of this thread. Now that I realize I'm not worthy of posting in this forum, I'll stop
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.