Steve Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6566177613zbe9f03927879099214d104a432d8c2c0z But wait... Tracking message source: 203.188.252.24: Routing details for 203.188.252.24[refresh/show] Cached whois for 203.188.252.24 : faruque@bangla.netinfo@bangla.net bounces (10 sent : 6 bounces)Using best contacts I even tried refreshing but will it will not update. Steve
lisati Posted August 17, 2019 Posted August 17, 2019 What constitutes a "bounce" in this context isn't always apparent to a volunteer such as myself. It could be anything, such as a dead email address, a full inbox or auto replies that have, for some reason, been counted as a bounce. As for why the reporting address didn't update, it's likely that whoever is responsible for updating reporting addresses in the database(s) Spamcop consults hasn't made any changes for a while.
petzl Posted August 17, 2019 Posted August 17, 2019 On 8/16/2019 at 5:34 PM, Steve said: https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6566177613zbe9f03927879099214d104a432d8c2c0z But wait... Tracking message source: 203.188.252.24: Routing details for 203.188.252.24[refresh/show] Cached whois for 203.188.252.24 : faruque@bangla.netinfo@bangla.net bounces (10 sent : 6 bounces)Using best contacts I even tried refreshing but will it will not update. Steve nayon.isnpAT[bangla.net.bd seems is the correct address
gnarlymarley Posted August 18, 2019 Posted August 18, 2019 2 hours ago, petzl said: nayon.isnpAT[bangla.net.bd seems is the correct address Interesting that the cached whois says it is from the mirror and the format of it is slightly different. Also interesting that APNIC and RIPE seem to have abandoned the separate abuse handle in favor of the following line: % Abuse contact for '203.188.252.0 - 203.188.252.255' is 'nayon.isn@bangla.net.bd' If I recall correctly, everyone used to use something similar to the following: OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@example.com
petzl Posted August 18, 2019 Posted August 18, 2019 43 minutes ago, gnarlymarley said: Interesting that the cached whois says it is from the mirror and the format of it is slightly different. Also interesting that APNIC and RIPE seem to have abandoned the separate abuse handle in favor of the following line: If I recall correctly, everyone used to use something similar to the following: OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@example.com Used to be postmaster@ then as that address spammed to oblivion became abuse@ that also is now spammed to oblivion, when abuse.net can't find a abuse address they use abuse@ as default. Wish SpamCop would stop using Abuse.net
gnarlymarley Posted September 4, 2019 Posted September 4, 2019 On 8/17/2019 at 7:38 PM, petzl said: Used to be postmaster@ then as that address spammed to oblivion became abuse@ that also is now spammed to oblivion, when abuse.net can't find a abuse address they use abuse@ as default. Wish SpamCop would stop using Abuse.net It has been a long time since I got spam at my abuse address. With mine being an alias, I still like the ability to know what address the email was sent to. It sure would be nice if the whois cache could be sync'ed and be more accurate.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.