Jump to content

search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net


Recommended Posts

Spamcop says:

 

Removing old cache entries.

Tracking details

Display data:
"whois 133.237.16.234@whois.arin.net" (Getting contact from whois.arin.net )
Found AbuseEmail in whois search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net
133.0.0.0 - 133.255.255.255:search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net
Routing details for 133.237.16.234
I refuse to bother search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net.

Using search-apnic-not-arin#apnic.net@devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

Using last resort contacts search-apnic-not-arin#apnic.net@devnull.spamcop.net

 

This is wrong and arin is right, Spamcop should search apnic:

 

$ whois 133.237.16.234
% IANA WHOIS server
% for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org
% This query returned 1 object

refer:        whois.apnic.net

inetnum:      133.0.0.0 - 133.255.255.255
organisation: Administered by APNIC
status:       LEGACY

whois:        whois.apnic.net

changed:      1997-03
source:       IANA

# whois.apnic.net


...

% Information related to '133.237.0.0 - 133.237.255.255'

inetnum:        133.237.0.0 - 133.237.255.255
netname:        RAKUTEN-NET
descr:          Rakuten,Inc.
country:        JP
admin-c:        JP00179607
tech-c:         JP00179607
remarks:        This information has been partially mirrored by APNIC from
remarks:        JPNIC. To obtain more specific information, please use the
remarks:        JPNIC WHOIS Gateway at
remarks:        http://www.nic.ad.jp/en/db/whois/en-gateway.html or
remarks:        whois.nic.ad.jp for WHOIS client. (The WHOIS client
remarks:        defaults to Japanese output, use the /e switch for English
remarks:        output)
last-modified:  2020-04-28T04:41:03Z
source:         JPNIC

% This query was served by the APNIC Whois Service version 1.88.15-SNAPSHOT (WHOIS-UK4)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martijn Lievaart said:

I refuse to bother search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net.

This has been going on for some time now.  From what I gather they have to manually add the route.  This is because of how they originally coded the system years ago and they didn't expect smaller IPv4 segements to be sold off to other RIRs.

http://forum.spamcop.net/topic/22304-search-apnic-not-arin-for-452483143/

Hopefully, they get a manual entry in for you and you can revisit the tracking URL and then submit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...