njabl: why double dip?

[rooster]

I'm just curious to know why the, "Not Just Another Block List" entry is repeated on the SC Reports I see.

<snip>

Yum, this spam is fresh!

Message is 2 hours old

88.111.17.43 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org

88.111.17.43 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org

88.111.17.43 listed in cbl.abuseat.org ( 127.0.0.2 )

88.111.17.43 is an open proxy

88.111.17.43 not listed in accredit.habeas.com

88.111.17.43 not listed in plus.bondedsender.org

88.111.17.43 not listed in iadb.isipp.com

<snip>

rod

[StevenUnderwood]

I'm just curious to know why the, "Not Just Another Block List" entry is repeated on the SC Reports I see.

32519[/snapback]

Good catch....I had not noticed, but just checked a whole bunch of my old Tracking URLs and all of them are showing it (which makes sense because the parse is run fresh on the old email).

Moving this to the Reporting Forum since it is a "problem" with parsing spam. Question sent upstairs.

[StevenUnderwood]

Response from upstairs:

Not to worry, no redundant lookups.  We're checking for two responses, and

sometimes more.

http://www.dnsstuff.com/ shows several different lists.

NJABL

NJABLDUL

NJABLDYNA

NJABLFORMMAIL

NJABLMULTI

NJABLPROXIES

NJABLSOURCES

- Don -

Thinking it might be nice to note the actual lookup being preformed rather that the server. Comments, perhaps a New Feature Request.

[rooster]

Thanks Guys;

I 'sussed' SC was accessing more than one list. It would be helpful to me if the 'secondary' list was specified, esp., "NJABLPROXIES", since that is the brand annoying me the most. The trend has shifted in that direction for my, 'targets'.