navybuff Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 See: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z818991693z9d...f97fc01b681f75z Discarded as fake... This site is up and running and has been for several weeks Thanks, NB SHINBIRO.COM [sHINBIRO-INFRA](Korea) Networks: [202.30.198.0-202.30.198.255] 202.30.198.207 Domains: http://digintotherhythm.com, http://deromen.com, http://sportowes.com, http://stupidpeoples.info, http://formepol.com, http://siminesto.com, http://drapors.com, http://yoquieromilk.com, http://twinatak.com, http://twinatak.com , http://idonthavethatone.com, http://mediahealthnews.info, http://strimel.info, http://sitechemist.info, http://bestnnedforhealth.info [202.30.198.207], http://atpennstation.com, http://www.couldyoupleasehelp.com, http://anilok.com, http://www.biglampshade.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Not just SpamCop - DNSReport has trouble with it too - http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.c...dforhealth.info resolves without the ngaowc. part, Your NS records at the parent servers are: ns2.yourgoldenhealth.info. [211.172.244.157] [TTL=86400] [KR] ns2.drrecommends.info. [211.172.244.157] [TTL=86400] [KR] ns1.yourgoldenhealth.info. [202.30.198.207] [TTL=86400] [KR] ns1.drrecommends.info. [202.30.198.207] [TTL=86400] [KR] but http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.c...dforhealth.info (the full ngaowc.bestnnedforhealth.info) results in [ERROR: The parent servers say that the domain ngaowc.bestnnedforhealth.info does not have any NS records (although they may have some other information on that zone). I can not do a DNS report on a hostname (such as mail.example.com) or a domain name that does not have its own zone.] Noting that no-one elected DNSReport the benchmark of the parser's capability, just that there are "issues" and whether it might be worth slowing the parsing process further to handle them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybuff Posted October 24, 2005 Author Share Posted October 24, 2005 Good info, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Good info, thanks 34761[/snapback] You're welcome. Not saying it is unreasonable to ask for the parser to "do better", this might be a case where it is worth taking further. We shall both await further comment with interest - but a "not the core purpose" thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.