Jump to content

Being block, but not listed.


jason

Recommended Posts

We have a problem where a handful of domains are blocking us with the folliwng message:

RCPT response: '451 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?199.253.130.170

'. Trying next host.

http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&...199.253.130.170

shows that we are not listed. Are there old dns records causing problems? We come up clean on things like:

http://www.moensted.dk/spam/?addr=199.253....p;Submit=Submit and

http://www.robtex.com/rbls/199.253.130.170.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a problem where a handful of domains are blocking us with the folliwng message:

RCPT response: '451 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?199.253.130.170

'. Trying next host.

http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&...199.253.130.170

shows that we are not listed. Are there old dns records causing problems? We come up clean on things like:

http://www.moensted.dk/spam/?addr=199.253....p;Submit=Submit and

http://www.robtex.com/rbls/199.253.130.170.html

Some systems do cache their results so it could take a while to expire. It is also possible that some of spamcop's mirrors have not released the IP yet.

> 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net

Server: kopdc01.kopin.com

Address: 10.1.75.11

Name: 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net

Address: 127.0.0.2

> 170.130.253.199.bl.spamcop.net

Server: kopdc01.kopin.com

Address: 10.1.75.11

*** kopdc01.kopin.com can't find 170.130.253.199.bl.spamcop.net: Non-existent do

main

>

If you are the admin, did you do anything about the misdirected bounces coming from the server? The subjects of the bounced messages are:

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

* spam MAIL * LOW * Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a history of misdirected bounces from that IP that goes back a long way:

Submitted: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 5:21:14 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1929717726 ( 199.253.130.170 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:08:38 PM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1901166316 ( 199.253.130.170 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:05:05 AM -0400: 
* spam MAIL * LOW * Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852617082 ( 199.253.130.170 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:23:07 AM -0400: 
* spam MAIL * LOW * Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852497977 ( 199.253.130.170 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14:43 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852109503 ( 199.253.130.170 ) To: dmastre[at]noridian.com 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14:41 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852109545 ( 199.253.130.170 ) To: dmastre[at]noridian.com 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14:39 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852109607 ( 199.253.130.170 ) To: dmastre[at]noridian.com 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14:39 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852109688 ( 199.253.130.170 ) To: dmastre[at]noridian.com 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14:37 AM -0400: 
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender 
1852109792 ( 199.253.130.170 ) To: dmastre[at]noridian.com 

Some of them may have hit spamtraps or been sent to innocent users of spamcop that reported them. There is a lot of discussion in this forum about mirrored lists aging slower than what you see on spamcop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a history of misdirected bounces from that IP that goes back a long way:

Some of them may have hit spamtraps or been sent to innocent users of spamcop that reported them.

Okay. I'm going to check out my policy that should drop the garbage... Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...