pixeldot Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 I just got a couple spam e-mails with the following content (see below). The problem is that when I view by raw source there is not much header information in order for SpamCop to generate a report to send. Should I assume that this is a type of e-mail that cannot be properly reported by SpamCop or is there some tool/process that can pull out more information from such a short header? Return-path: <MSantill7[at]aol.com> From: MSantill7[at]aol.com Message-ID: <c8d.3582b884.366209ba[at]aol.com> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:58:02 EST Subject: 73650 X-Mailer: AOL 2.5 for Windows sub 2 923800909 all the hottest barely legal girls! <a href="http://plzlink.me/1f">click here now!</a> **************Life should be easier. So should your homepage. Try the NEW AOL.com. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000002)
StevenUnderwood Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 Please provide a TrackingURL so we can see what headers are there. You have provided no headers at all. If that is all that is there, then this would have to be AOL on AOL spam and your only choice would be to report it internally.
rconner Posted November 30, 2008 Posted November 30, 2008 I just got a couple spam e-mails with the following content (see below). I assume you've seen (and followed) the instructions at http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/19.html for revealing the full, unmodified e-mail message. With regard to tracking URLs, read this Wiki page. I also assume that you are an AOL user (or, at any rate, the recipient of the message is an AOL user). The header you have quoted contains no "Received" lines, so SpamCop cannot do much with it. Possibly you may have left these lines out inadvertently, or perhaps AOL does not put them into messages that are sent and received entirely within the AOL domain (as Steven suggests). If the latter, then you need to take the matter up with AOL as Steven recommends. -- rick
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.