Wazoo Posted September 28, 2004 Share Posted September 28, 2004 OK, still doing the interpreter thing ... here's Mike Easter's comback from "over there" ... WazoO wrote: > "WazoO" <nobody[at]devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:cj24ra$jf2$1[at]news.spamcop.net... >> http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2700 >> >> "Bob" came up with a wild scenario ... Mike E. - is >> this a known issue? (yet <g>) Here's a bit of a clip; > > Well, the invite to come directly "here" wasn't taken, > but in the follow-up, "Bob" offers his thanks to > Mike Easter and Blammo (though offering some > debate points <g>) Trying to convert his last > post to plain text to cart over here just looked like > too much work, so passing on the thanks at > least ... invitation to take a look at his last to > catch his points .. but as his problem is > "resolved" ....???? Okay. I saw what he sed. Thanks. I can't discuss the 'quality' or veracity of EL's screenshots for Navigator instructions, as I'm not Navigator. And, EL has been known to be 'inconsistent' which is one form of 'wrong' in their instructions for certain things which include screenshots. EL's instructions for submitting 'complete' spam to their junkmail feedback system if you are using OE would have you open the spam and go thru' some machinations which would lead to you copying rendered spam pasted under the complete headers. Other EL instructions for other agents would have you using unrendered spam under complete headers. The only thing which is consistent about that part of the EL instructions is that they do manage to get complete headers, which I guess is really their target. I doubt if they care anything about proper identification of the spambody content; but I don't know what Brightmail does at their place, which is the EL spamfilter provider, and the ultimate recipient of the EL junkmail address. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.