Jump to content

hank

Membera
  • Posts

    180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

2,594 profile views

hank's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (3/6)

0

Reputation

  1. Here's the full report: X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on f.spam.sonic.net X-spam-Level: X-spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=4.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SNF4SA,SONIC_BX_A2,SPF_HELO_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.6 X-spam-SNF-Result: 0 (Standard White Rules) X-spam-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: X-spam-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-2429-c X-spam-GBUdb-Analysis: 1, 184.94.240.112, Ugly c=0.357145 p=-0.1875 Source Normal Received: from d.mx.sonic.net (a.spam-proxy.sonic.net [157.131.224.145]) by b.local-delivery (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 24BHxOUk006899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <xxxxxxxx@lds.sonic.net>; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:59:24 -0700 Received: from vmx.spamcop.net (vmx.spamcop.net [184.94.240.112]) by d.mx.sonic.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 24BHxNqN107202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <xxxxxxxx@sonic.net>; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:59:24 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: s=devnull; d=spamcop.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=IronPort-SDR:X-Corpus-CASE-Score:Received:Received:From: To:Subject:Precedence:Message-ID:Date:X-Mailer; b=KkvP5aBl9Md+4drBRSvljnJEAe3hevTgrPPG9aq8eJI+L5ZBTpstUh23 xCa44jj5nnkVlI6Mycnv2MvtKrBozt9G7mb+FJKINxKEGXkUvkQqHKA/E ausfD3p8pn5jzDh; IronPort-SDR: eXGcifgOTQE0pAsvFRW89f+ynULjxySmlh6vohXzvc95FKXZvT2UqhXWlGW6eQnRD8/5l6/hxy ffjnIaPZyO5t2pTyPUZVy6iFQ2gKMn1b3WKibBmx8/sjg18AXCwPdLvbri/XbkdgydvkpxwMro JNoJ6l4CUpU4wB0nWH4vOrB9ncxmUUY5h+y5qsRMoRiph+MrelrGRwBuf5VXqHoI7G22uV3DzR NFPKK1VEOZus6GuX5AMmSvKACSLyHjJKKLQg12YVKc4zVdHtVBrnp8jrmNwBUTY7x2hrxjVcAC ONI= X-Corpus-CASE-Score: 0 Received: from prod-sc-www02.sv4.ironport.com (HELO prod-sc-www02.spamcop.net) ([10.8.129.226]) by prod-sc-smtp-vip.sv4.ironport.com with SMTP; 11 May 2022 10:58:18 -0700 Received: from [135.180.216.255] by spamcop.net with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2022 17:58:12 GMT From: SpamCop <spamcop@devnull.spamcop.net> To: xxxxxxxx@sonic.net Subject: [SpamCop] Email Delivery Confirmation Precedence: list Message-ID: <wh627bf934g75b2@msgid.spamcop.net> Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:58:12 GMT X-Mailer: https://www.spamcop.net/ v5.4.0 X-Orthrus: tar=0 grey=no co=US os=FreeBSD/9.x or newer/2 spf=pass dkim=pass Please confirm email delivery for SpamCop account: hank@spamcop.net Click here: https://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?conf=un6FJSBii5iMUvqCILI1ihJWw8CkUP0o Or send email to: deliver.un6FJSBii5iMUvqCILI1ihJWw8CkUP0o@cmds.spamcop.net
  2. I don't understand your aswer -- should I report the message and see what Spamcop says about it?
  3. Just got this in email -- ----------------------- Subject [SpamCop] Email Delivery Confirmation Please confirm email delivery for SpamCop account:hank@spamcop.netClick here:https://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?conf=un6FJSBii5iMUvqCILI1ihJWw8CkUP0oOr send email to:deliver.un6FJSBii5iMUvqCILI1ihJWw8CkUP0o@cmds.spamcop.net ----------------------- Smells phishy to me but I can't pointt o anything specifically wrong. WTF?
  4. How about "mail.spamcop.net" -- shouldn't that be a good address? Suddenly my reporting of spam is rejected, password reset doesn't help, ping says it's an unknown host, sometimes, and other times gives very long delays, viz: 30 packets transmitted, 29 packets received, 3.3% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 201.782/228.961/292.230/29.676 ms
  5. I'd guess the spam-crafters study these threads, to find out which of their tricks works to avoid reporting.
  6. Using Mac Mail, I just right-click and "forward as attachment" to the Spamcop reporting address.
  7. One problem with editing spam -- you have to open it. Not such a good idea when it may be loaded with malware.
  8. I know spammers are increasingly hiding addressee names/email in the spam text so automatic reports end up disclosing the info about the reporter and confirming an email address is valid and thus saleable to other spammers. Could Spamcop allow each user to specify a few strings that would become XXXX in reports? That would be one's personal name and email, to find them and wipe them out of the reports. For a while I was doing that by hand, editing reports --- and that did reduce the amount of followon spam I was getting --- but it's a tedious process at best.
  9. And got a couple more this morning, also reported to Richard. Is anyone else getting these messages? I guess I should ask Richard ....
  10. And a reply after I reported it: So, I'm guessing the problem occurs because of mail senders adding new servers -- thinking about how when we set up a mail source we're offered a list of servers to verify, and told we can do one or more of them --- I guess after the fact the sender must be creating new servers that we don't get a chance to list for Spamcop.
  11. It was the familiar "Mailhost configuration problem ...." No point requoting the tracking URL link here, as I believe that we have learned that the destination of those links will have changed as soon as Richard of Spamcop fixed the problem. He replied to my followup question -- I asked whether there is a way that I could fix these myself. The answer is no: And he went on to say So am happy to settle for knowing we have a guardian angel working at Spamcop who can resolve the "Mailhost configuration problem" error messages.
  12. Just got another of those "mailhost" error messages; I sent it to Spamcop Richard figuring that's the best way to resolve them. I do wish he'd tell us how to fix them, since others have gotten them too in the past. But maybe by now it's just me.
  13. Yeah, but I suspect nowadays I carry more computing power in my backpack .... progress is scary sometimes.
  14. > what I did with Acoustic coupler, vt-100 terminal/300 baud modem Logged into the WELL's VAX 11/750 in its early days. Didn't even need a home computer, just a phone line.
×
×
  • Create New...