Geek Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Hello, Regarding report: http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrac...rtid=4039218633 of IP: 210.116.160.59 Shows "nomaster[at]devnull.spamcop.net" Here's your master: inetnum: 210.116.0.0 - 210.119.255.255 netname: KRNIC-KR descr: KRNIC descr: Korea Network Information Center country: KR admin-c: HM127-AP tech-c: HM127-AP remarks: ****************************************** remarks: KRNIC is the National Internet Registry remarks: in Korea under APNIC. If you would like to remarks: find assignment information in detail remarks: please refer to the KRNIC Whois DB remarks: http://whois.nic.or.kr/english/index.html remarks: ****************************************** mnt-by: APNIC-HM mnt-lower: MNT-KRNIC-AP changed: hm-changed[at]apnic.net 19961126 changed: hm-changed[at]apnic.net 20010606 changed: hm-changed[at]apnic.net 20040319 status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE source: APNIC person: Host Master address: 11F, KTF B/D, 1321-11, Seocho2-Dong, Seocho-Gu, address: Seoul, Korea, 137-857 country: KR phone: +82-2-2186-4500 fax-no: +82-2-2186-4496 e-mail: hostmaster[at]nic.or.kr nic-hdl: HM127-AP mnt-by: MNT-KRNIC-AP changed: hostmaster[at]nic.or.kr 20020507 source: APNIC inetnum: 210.116.128.0 - 210.116.255.255 netname: SEJONGNET-KR descr: SEJONG TELECOM country: KR admin-c: IA109-KR tech-c: IM109-KR status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE mnt-by: MNT-KRNIC-AP remarks: This information has been partially mirrored by APNIC from remarks: KRNIC. To obtain more specific information, please use the remarks: KRNIC whois server at whois.krnic.net. changed: hostmaster[at]nic.or.kr source: KRNIC I've been getting dozens of "no master" over the past week that are APNIC related. Should I do this for all, or will the computer detect these eventually? Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rconner Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 I've been getting dozens of "no master" over the past week that are APNIC related. Should I do this for all, or will the computer detect these eventually? I can't get at your tracking link (I think you snagged the wrong one), but your quote shows info for KRNIC, which you may or may not know is not an ISP but a national level registry for Korean IP numbers. You have to go a level deeper to get the actual ISP: whois -h whois.nic.or.kr 210.116.160.59 query: 210.116.160.59 (---skipping Korean output---) # ENGLISH KRNIC is not an ISP but a National Internet Registry similar to APNIC. The IPv4 address is allocated and still held by the following ISP, or its Whois information is not updated after assigned to end users. Please contact following ISP for further information. [ ISP Organization Information ] Org Name : SEJONG TELECOM Service Name : SEJONGNET Org Address : Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-gu Org Detail Address: Hyundai B/D, 646-1 [ ISP IPv4 Admin Contact Information ] Name : IP Administrator Phone : +82-2-3415-4330 E-Mail : ip[at]sejongtelecom.net [ ISP IPv4 Tech Contact Information ] Name : IP Manager Phone : +82-2-3415-4320 E-mail : ip[at]sejongtelecom.net [ ISP Network Abuse Contact Information ] Name : Network Abuse Phone : +82-2-3415-4308 E-mail : abuse[at]sejongtelecom.net So there IS a master for this address, but I don't know why SpamCop wouldn't have found it (since it should normally be able to "see through" KRNIC). Sometimes I have had success with these by shift-refreshing the report page. -- rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmaxx Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 I can't get at your tracking link (I think you snagged the wrong one), but your quote shows info for KRNIC, which you may or may not know is not an ISP but a national level registry for Korean IP numbers. You have to go a level deeper to get the actual ISP: So there IS a master for this address, but I don't know why SpamCop wouldn't have found it (since it should normally be able to "see through" KRNIC). Sometimes I have had success with these by shift-refreshing the report page. I, too, am unsure of why SpamCop didn't find the master. Typically if it were just a case of the ISP in question being a known spam-host or the abuse address bouncing, SpamCop would just send it to devnull[at]spamcop.net or something like that. In this case it may be a case of SpamCop timing out before it can resolve the actual ISP. In that case, what you may need to do is go back up and do a "refresh/show" on the host and sometimes that'll kick-start SpamCop into reporting the correct site. I won't go so far as to say that'll fix it, but it's unlikely to hurt anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.