goldeneye Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Except that this time, it now references to a set of IP address space with no contact info, which has now been sent to nomaster because of the lack of contact info... 8 out my last 13 sent submissions, and that has been since April 24 are for this Romanian snowshoe crap with The space 94.49.0.0/16 or better yet, the space 94.48.0.0/15 should be totally blocked until that snowshoe spam farm has been kicked out. The IP addresses (sending and referred) have been this list: 94.49.123.207 94.49.137.17 94.49.123.174 94.49.136.163 94.49.123.143 94.49.136.101 94.49.123.109 94.49.136.40 94.49.121.226 94.49.131.175 94.49.121.136 94.49.131.5 94.49.121.37 94.49.130.70 94.49.120.134 94.49.129.6 And according to robtex... All of these IP addresses belong to AS47931, ALE-NETWORK, apparently based out of (surprise, surprise) Romania. And they apparently own these netblocks... 94.48.160.0/24 ALE NETWORK 94.49.120.0/21 ALE NETWORK 94.49.128.0/18 ALE NETWORK The reason why I am calling for the entire 94.48.0.0/15 netblock to be blocked is every known registered IP block of either 94.48.0.0/16 and 94.49.0.0/16 are known Romanian snowshoe spam farm suspects. Spamcop - please block the entire 94.48.0.0/15 netblock for these reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agsteele Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Spamcop - please block the entire 94.48.0.0/15 netblock for these reasons. I can understand your frustration However, the SCBL doesn't work in that way and I guess it would be a massive change in philosophy. So it's pretty unlikely to get attention. But I think there are other DNSBLs that might do what your suggesting so you could implement them in your filtering. You could post this as a suggestion as new feature request. Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turetzsr Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 <snip> Spamcop - please block the entire 94.48.0.0/15 netblock for these reasons. Hi, goldeneye! ...Sorry, that's not how SpamCop works. First, it's important to emphasize that SpamCop itself blocks nothing (except for a very few sources of mail directed to SpamCop e-mail inboxes). IP addresses seen as sources of spam are placed on the SpamCop blacklist programmatically if they meet the criteria for listing and are delisted when they meet the criteria for delisting. See SpamCop FAQ (a link to which appears near the top left of pretty much every SpamCop Forum page) entry labeled "What is on the list?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Following up on Andrew's observation: ...But I think there are other DNSBLs that might do what your suggesting so you could implement them in your filtering. http://multirbl.valli.org/dnsbl-lookup/94.49.121.136.html (etc.) The much-maligned SORBS picks up this bunch consistently. Spamhaus SBL has a snowshoe component but isn't (so far) picking these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.