Snowbat Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z4211710138z5...5c53e2c692ba50z Tracking message source: 62.94.218.81: Display data: "whois 62.94.218.81[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) Lookup dsva1-ripe[at]whois.ripe.net Display data: "whois dsva1-ripe[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) dsva1-ripe = whois.ripe.net 62.94.218.81 (nothing found) No reporting addresses found for 62.94.218.81, using devnull for tracking. $ whois -h whois.ripe.net -B 62.94.218.81 % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf % Information related to '62.94.218.80 - 62.94.218.87' inetnum: 62.94.218.80 - 62.94.218.87 netname: DBNETSRL-VIAASERRANTI descr: DBNET SRL - VIA A. SERRANTI country: IT admin-c: DSVA1-RIPE tech-c: DSVA1-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: EUTELIA-MNT changed: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it 20090902 source: RIPE person: DBNET SRL - VIA A SERRANTI address: VIA A. SERRANTI , 12 address: I-00040 MONTECOMPATRI phone: +39 0694788002 nic-hdl: DSVA1-RIPE changed: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it 20090902 source: RIPE % Information related to '62.94.0.0/16AS15589' route: 62.94.0.0/16 descr: EUTELIA origin: AS15589 mnt-by: EDISONTEL-MNT notify: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it changed: ipadmin[at]ipng.it 20000810 changed: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it 20040423 source: RIPE % Information related to '62.94.192.0/19AS15589' route: 62.94.192.0/19 descr: EUTELIA origin: AS15589 remarks: Rome Core #2 notify: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it mnt-by: EDISONTEL-MNT changed: ipadmin[at]edisontel.it 20021211 changed: ipadmin[at]eutelia.it 20040423 source: RIPE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpamCopAdmin Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 If there was a working abuse address in all that, we would have something. As it is it's just a wasted post. - Don D'Minion - SpamCop Admin - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnarlymarley Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 If there was a working abuse address in all that, we would have something. As it is it's just a wasted post. Second reason for wasted post is that the -B is not an option for use with whois with linux, freebsd, or solaris. There is no explanation on what the -B option is. What is Snowbat talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Second reason for wasted post is that the -B is not an option for use with whois with linux, freebsd, or solaris. There is no explanation on what the -B option is. What is Snowbat talking about? Simply put, the "-B" option is not a command-switch/flag, which is why you don't see it listed as part of the man/documentation for the 'whois' command. It is a command-line variable that gets passed to the RIPE server in the whois query string, which has its code modified to handle that extra option/function. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnarlymarley Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Simply put, the "-B" option is not a command-switch/flag, which is why you don't see it listed as part of the man/documentation for the 'whois' command. It is a command-line variable that gets passed to the RIPE server in the whois query string, which has its code modified to handle that extra option/function. Thank you for the explanation as I was not able to find anything through google. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.