Mike L. Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 When attempting to report this spam the following is all I get. SpamCop version 1.3.4 © SpamCop.net, Inc. 1998-2004 All Rights Reserved Saved email: This page may be saved for future reference: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z272711266z2b...d5770d744f6287z Skip to Reports Parsing header: Received: from 63.240.76.26 (unknown[219.144.194.18](misconfigured sender)) by sccrmxc12.comcast.net (sccrmxc12) with SMTP id <20040129003712s1200ir52re>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:38:02 +0000 host 219.144.194.18 (getting name) no name Possible spammer: 219.144.194.18 Received line accepted Tracking message source: 219.144.194.18: Routing details for 219.144.194.18 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 219.144.194.18 : anti-spam[at]ns.chinanet.cn.net hostmaster[at]ns.chinanet.cn.net ipadm[at]public.xa.sn.cn abuse net chinanet.cn.net = postmaster[at]chinanet.cn.net, anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net, ctsummary[at]special.abuse.net abuse net chinanet.cn.net = postmaster[at]chinanet.cn.net, anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net, ctsummary[at]special.abuse.net Using last resort contacts postmaster[at]chinanet.cn.net anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net ctsummary[at]special.abuse.net ipadm[at]public.xa.sn.cn postmaster[at]chinanet.cn.net bounces (99 sent : 20164 bounces) Using postmaster#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking. anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net bounces (142 sent : 100 bounces) Using anti-spam#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking. 219.144.194.18 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org ( 127.0.0.9 ) 219.144.194.18 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org ( 127.0.0.9 ) 219.144.194.18 is an open proxy 219.144.194.18 not listed in plus.bondedsender.org 219.144.194.18 not listed in query.bondedsender.org Would send message source reports to: Re: 219.144.194.18 (Administrator of network where email originates) anti-spam#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net ipadm[at]public.xa.sn.cn ctsummary[at]special.abuse.net postmaster#chinanet.cn.net[at]devnull.spamcop.net Re: 219.144.194.18 (Third party interested in email source) spamcop[at]imaphost.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 Please see FAQ Entry: Known causes of the "Would send" behavior at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=122. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.