cwg Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Got CC'ed on a query from an upstream on a report I submitted: From: "nFrame Abuse Management" <abuse[at]nframe.com> To: <tech[at]cedarbridgellc.com> Cc: "cwg" <reportid[at]reports.spamcop.net>, "nFrame Abuse Management" <abuse[at]nframe.com> Subject: RE: [spamCop (z_User_Notification) id:5515939987]THIS WAS HOW I SUCCEEDED GETTING MY FUNDS Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:19:06 -0400 Hello tech[at]cedarbridgellc.com, We received the following complaint from reports.spamcop.net regarding activity related to 64.72.140.65. Please take a moment to review it and respond to the complainant. Please Cc: abuse[at]nframe.com in your response. In the absence of a response within 72 hours of the forwarded message, we will filter all traffic to and from that address at our network edge per our AUP (http://www.nframe.com/collateral/nFrame_AUP.pdf). Your prompt attention is appreciated, Abuse Response Team nFrame abuse[at]nframe.com 317-805-3759, option 3, 3 Wonder if cedarbridgellc is going to respond to this with a CC themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turetzsr Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 ...Wait, something is really, really wrong here -- a provider that actually seeks to enforce an anti-spam provision in their AUP? Whoever heard of such a perverse thing! <g> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.