Jump to content

System change catching more e-mail?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Is something new with the system? All of a sudden a number of my legit messages, stuff that has been getting through fine for years, are being trapped.

Posted
Is something new with the system? All of a sudden a number of my legit messages, stuff that has been getting through fine for years, are being trapped.

13839[/snapback]

Please post the disposition headers so we can have some insight as to why they are being trapped.

As far as I know, there have been no changes and I have experienced no change in my mail processing.

Posted
Please post the disposition headers so we can have some insight as to why they are being trapped.

As far as I know, there have been no changes and I have experienced no change in my mail processing.

13840[/snapback]

Here's one:

Return-Path: <pj72205[at]swbell.net>

Delivered-To: spamcop-net-carrickp[at]spamcop.net

Received: (qmail 22991 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 18:35:19 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO c60.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.105)

by blade6.cesmail.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 18:35:19 -0000

Received: from mailgate.cesmail.net (216.154.195.36)

by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 14:35:14 -0400

X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,84,1089000000";

d="scan'208"; a="92531702:sNHT27714236"

Received: (qmail 19193 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 18:35:14 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101)

by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 18:35:14 -0000

Delivered-To: aristotle-net-carrickp[at]aristotle.net

Received: from mail.aristotle.net [206.66.224.87]

by mailgate.cesmail.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.1)

for carrickp[at]spamcop.net (single-drop); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:35:14 -0400 (EDT)

Received: (qmail 22037 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 18:26:02 -0000

Received: from unknown (HELO apollo.aristotle.net) (206.66.224.93)

by mail1.aristotle.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 18:26:02 -0000

Received: from smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (unverified [66.163.168.180]) by apollo.aristotle.net

(Vircom SMTPRS 3.0.286) with SMTP id <C0062036929[at]apollo.aristotle.net> for <carrickp[at]aristotle.net>;

Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:26:03 -0500

Received: from unknown (HELO ?216.63.184.224?) (pj72205[at]swbell.net[at]216.63.184.224 with login)

by smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 18:25:59 -0000

User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405

Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:25:58 -0500

Subject: Shoes

From: Paul Johnson <pj72205[at]swbell.net>

To: Carrick Patterson <carrickp[at]aristotle.net>

Message-ID: <BD26C266.30E7%pj72205[at]swbell.net>

Mime-version: 1.0

Content-type: text/plain;

charset="US-ASCII"

Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade6

X-spam-Level:

X-spam-Status: hits=0.9 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS version=2.63

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 206.66.224.87

X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net

Posted

The reason this one was blocked is in the two lines;

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 206.66.224.87

X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net

So is there something about this that concerns you? Do you need to work on your whitelist? Was this a "good" e-mail?

Posted
The reason this one was blocked is in the two lines;

X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 206.66.224.87

X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net

So is there something about this that concerns you?  Do you need to work on your whitelist?  Was this a "good" e-mail?

13847[/snapback]

Well, it's a friend who sends me several e-mails a week and none ever has been caught before, that's all. So I wondered why. Of course I have now whitelisted him. Just curious about the change. Thanks.

Posted

Looks like Aristotle.net has some pond scum in the middle of a spam run this week. You would be better off to whitelist your friend.

Click here for some examples.

The jerks were even dumb enough to spam a blocklist.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...