Wazoo Posted October 24, 2004 Share Posted October 24, 2004 Direct from the spamcop newsgroup .... one just has to appreciate this user's perspective on the world <g> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= look bud who gives a rat's ass where i choose to post is this not a newsgroup for Spamcop????? > I would only make that change based on the input of those > other users that worked on putting those documents > together huh? it's not the users who posted that call it Filters...it's Spamcop > I would suggest going back "over there" and > looking through all the previous discussion about the > use and application of filters i did read EVERY thread referring to personal filters on the SpamCop forums...did u? since u provided no answers to ANY of my questions, why are u posting a response? i am looking for advice on how to solve the problems i indicated i have been a Spamcop member since it's inception but have only STOPPED forwarding my e-mails to Outlook Express recently and decidied to go with webmail trolls like u make me sick... "WazoO" <nobody[at]devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message news:clgqqg$bbq$1[at]news.spamcop.net... > "Tampon Tea" <x4zbs9z001[at]sneakemail.com> wrote in message > news:clglmf$3lc$1[at]news.spamcop.net... > > first i have read the following FAQs > > forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2238 > > http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2321 > > > http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...&p=12082entry > > 12082 > > > > secondly, it seems Spamcop has two meanings for filter > > (1) all the mail that enters the system is "filtered" for spam > > (2) personal "filters" to have mail forwarded from inbox to user-created > > folders > > > > i wish that in number (2), SpamCop used the phrase "message rules" instead > > I would only make that change based on the input of those > other users that worked on putting those documents > together. Why is it that you read them "over there" > but chose to post/complain about them "here" ..??? > The only "valid" link in your post goes to a bit of discussion > amongst SpamCop users that had a link placed pointing to it > within that version of the FAQ, which also has a note that > explains that "I" put that thing together, and "I" am not a > SpamCop Admin or Official type. Heck, I don't use the > parser that much these days outside of trying to analyze > other people's issues. (Reports sent on 27 July, then > one out on 19 October ... not the typical SpamCop > reporter, but ...) > > > my problem is that my inbox is not being filtered to move incoming mail by > > the personal filters that i have created > > instead they sit in the inbox > > Support for the webmail tool by decree of JT that was in > the spamcop.mail newsgroup was to be handled over in > those Fora that you cited in your FAQ reference. I can > state that your described scenario has generated a lot > of discussion over there (don't follow the spamcop.mail > group) I would suggest going back "over there" and > looking through all the previous discussion about the > use and application of filters. Any changes and / or > suggestions to the FAQ "over there" are always > welcome, but ... as I don't use the e-mail side of > the house, I defer to those that do to set me straight. > Noting your choice of nomen within a public forum, > I can say that you are unknown to me either here or there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.