RobiBue Posted December 22, 2021 Share Posted December 22, 2021 https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6734860051zc341d4446bdd92013698b650963ff273z Tracking message source: 153.120.151.105: Routing details for 153.120.151.105 De-referencing sakura.ad.jp@abuse.net abuse net sakura.ad.jp = support@sakura.ad.jp, abuse@sakura.ad.jp Report routing for 153.120.151.105: support@sakura.ad.jp, abuse@sakura.ad.jp, abuse@sakura.ad.jp Routing details for 153.120.151.105 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 153.120.151.105 : search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net I refuse to bother search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net. SpamCop shouldn't stop there, but follow the whois path given! Why SC doesn't now continue checking on whois.apnic.net but instead stops, I don't know. I suppose whois.arin.net changed something and SC never got updated to the new format. If I do a whois in my cygwin terminal, whois automatically continues to the new referral: $ whois -h whois.arin.net 153.120.151.105 # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/tou/ # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/inaccuracy_reporting/ # # Copyright 1997-2021, American Registry for Internet Numbers, Ltd. # NetRange: 153.0.0.0 - 153.255.255.255 CIDR: 153.0.0.0/8 NetName: APNIC-ERX-153 NetHandle: NET-153-0-0-0-0 Parent: () NetType: Early Registrations, Maintained by APNIC OriginAS: Organization: Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) RegDate: 1993-05-01 Updated: 2010-07-30 Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/ip/153.0.0.0 ResourceLink: http://wq.apnic.net/whois-search/static/search.html ResourceLink: whois.apnic.net [...] # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/tou/ # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/inaccuracy_reporting/ # # Copyright 1997-2021, American Registry for Internet Numbers, Ltd. # Found a referral to whois.apnic.net. % [whois.apnic.net] % Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html % Information related to '153.120.0.0 - 153.120.191.255' % Abuse contact for '153.120.0.0 - 153.120.191.255' is 'hostmaster@nic.ad.jp' inetnum: 153.120.0.0 - 153.120.191.255 netname: SAKURA-ISHIKARI descr: SAKURA Internet Inc. The abuse contact should be hostmaster@nic.ad.jp given in whois.apnic.net. also, looking up the abuse.net db, I get the following: https://www.abuse.net/lookup.phtml?domain=sakura.ad.jp Look up an address in the abuse.net contact database support@sakura.ad.jp (for sakura.ad.jp) abuse@sakura.ad.jp (for sakura.ad.jp) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnarlymarley Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 On 12/22/2021 at 3:46 PM, RobiBue said: SpamCop shouldn't stop there, but follow the whois path given! Why SC doesn't now continue checking on whois.apnic.net but instead stops, I don't know. I suppose whois.arin.net changed something and SC never got updated to the new format. If I do a whois in my cygwin terminal, whois automatically continues to the new referral: I keep hoping that someone at SpamCop might pick up the following request and to implement this. From what I currently understand, SpamCop only follows certain whois referral entries. Be nice if they could follow all of them. This was noticed around 2012 when Apnic and RipeNCC ran out of IPv4 addresses and started exchanging then with the other RIRs. Richard was having to manually update all the entries to sort them out. Manual changes take too long and it would be better to automate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobiBue Posted December 24, 2021 Author Share Posted December 24, 2021 (edited) wait a minute... que? what? que? since 2012? and Manuel still looks as fresh as he did in that old post? I know NOTHING! I'm from Barcelona! joking aside (I blame it on Fawlty Towers)... Yeah, it's about time that this Cisco conglomerate uses their knowledge and background to effectively improve this spam fighting tool. edit: dang! I had completely forgot that I was involved in that thread.... (I blame that on my age!) Edited December 24, 2021 by RobiBue old age Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnarlymarley Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 4 hours ago, RobiBue said: edit: dang! I had completely forgot that I was involved in that thread.... (I blame that on my age!) Sometimes it is good to see a new post so that somebody sees it. I had forgotten about it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.