Jump to content

gzidc.com as "interested 3rd-party"


bur

Recommended Posts

I just discovered that gzidc.com was added as an interested 3rd-party to

receive information about asian hosted spamvertized sites. Their site

looks like they're a webhoster and all I found about them in the

list-archive is that seemingly they once also hosted spamvertized sites

and were said to be "unresponsive".

Why do they want a copy of the reports? Though probably spamcop admins

will have checked them to be legit, I don't like the idea of

sending some chinese webhoster (sorry, but the many spamhosts there give

the whole chinese IT a bad name to me) gets information like spamvertized URLs

as we all know that quite often the spammers encode the recipients

address in the URL.

So any informations about this company and what they intend to do with

the info collected would be welcomed. :)

Greets,

Florian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the idea of sending some chinese webhoster ... gets information like spamvertized URLs as we all know that quite often the spammers encode the recipients address in the URL.

39574[/snapback]

You are always free to uncheck any recipient you don't feel "right" about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I know and that's what I do currently. But it's not that I don't feel right about them, nor do I feel right for them, I don't know who they are. So if this company to me has legitimate use for those spam mails they can get all the reports they want as I surely don't begrudge spamcop earning some money to pay the bills. On the contrary I want to help.

I'd just like to know who they are and what they intend to do with the reports. Call me leery, but that's how it is... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if this company to me has legitimate use for those spam mails they can get all the reports they want as I surely don't begrudge spamcop earning some money to pay the bills. On the contrary I want to help.

39602[/snapback]

????? Please explain what you are suggesting ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds tome like bur thinks that spamcop gets paid for these reports.  The only situation like that is the Cyveilance (spamcop[at]imaphost.com) arrangement.

39615[/snapback]

To which the "money changing hands" was defined as the "cost of the bandwidth" involved .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...