moulty Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 The following does not get detected - returned as "could not find your spam" in the attachment. Received: from vmx1.spamcop.net (vmx1.spamcop.net [204.15.82.27]) by sc-app5.soma.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CE42F96D for <submit.key[at]spam.spamcop.net>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from my localhost (myIP) by vmx1.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2006 05:06:24 -0800 Received: from mySMTPhost ([mySMTP_IP]) by myDomain (sccrmhc14) with SMTP id <20060213130615014002dfrge>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:06:15 +0000 Received: from [myIP] by mySMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:59:28 +0000 From: myEmail To: submit.key[at]spam.spamcop.net Subject: FW: sims fictitious Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:59:28 +0000 Message-Id: <021320061259.18439.43F082B000098C56000048072200751150979B049A0103[at]myDomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: "Reed Christopher" <uqysiatyys[at]shylock.net> To: "Rbbsfo" <uqysiatyys[at]shylock.net> Subject: sims fictitious Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:35:20 +0000 --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 From: "Reed Christopher" <uqysiatyys[at]shylock.net> To: "Rbbsfo" <uqysiatyys[at]shylock.net> Subject: sims fictitious Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:35:20 +0000 Content-Type: Multipart/mixed; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_1" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" [spam email message body elided by Jeff G.] --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_1-- --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_0-- The email which triggered this auto-response had the following headers: Return-Path: <myEmail> Received: from vmx1.spamcop.net (vmx1.spamcop.net [204.15.82.27]) by sc-app5.soma.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CE42F96D for <submit.key[at]spam.spamcop.net>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mySMTP (SMTP_IP) by vmx1.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2006 05:06:24 -0800 Received: from mySMTP ([SMTP_IP]) by myDomain (sccrmhc14) with SMTP id <20060213130615014002dfrge>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:06:15 +0000 Received: from [myIP] by mySMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:59:28 +0000 From: myEmail To: submit.key[at]spam.spamcop.net Subject: FW: sims fictitious Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:59:28 +0000 Message-Id: <021320061259.18439.43F082B000098C56000048072200751150979B049A0103[at]myDomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_18439_1139835568_0" Edit: 2006/02/13 10:10 EST -0500 Jeff G. elided the spam email message body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 The problem is that you did not forward your spam email message AS ATTACHMENT to your Confidential Submit Address so that the Parser could see the Headers in the full, unmodified, complete, raw message. Please see How to "Forward as Attachment" and/or How do I get my email program to reveal the full, unmodified email? for details. Also, what made you think that posting a spam email message body here was ok? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moulty Posted February 13, 2006 Author Share Posted February 13, 2006 The problem is that you did not forward your spam email message AS ATTACHMENT to your Confidential Submit Address so that the Parser could see the Headers in the full, unmodified, complete, raw message. [...]40398[/snapback] I submit a couple dozen spams more or less every day; I've never forwarded one to Spamcop except as an attachment, and that (I think) was my point: the fact that Spamcop isn't seeing it, in the case of the latest spams from the particular spammer in question. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.