Jump to content

SpamCop not sending abuse reports?


petzl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Feeling a but dense for some reason ....

Tracking message source: 59.87.250.39:

Routing details for 59.87.250.39

[refresh/show] Cached whois for 59.87.250.39 : abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Using abuse net on abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

abuse net usen.ad.jp = postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp, abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Using best contacts postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Reports regarding this spam have already been sent:

Re: 59.87.250.39 (Administrator of network where email originates)

Reportid: 1923235460 To: abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Reportid: 1923235467 To: postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp

Reportid: 1923235473 To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

If reported today, reports would be sent to:

Re: 59.87.250.39 (Administrator of network where email originates)

abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp

Re: 59.87.250.39 (Third party interested in email source)

spamcop[at]imaphost.com

Technically, I'm thinking that it looks OK.

On the other hand ....

From: "Wazoo"

To: Deputies

Subject: abuse.net lookup "adds" an address

Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:27:17 -0500

Noted in Tracking URL

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1066833353z4...46fe1b0fa0c66bz

Data shown at http://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=rcache;ip=59.87.250.39

Tracking details

"whois 59.87.250.39[at]whois.apnic.net" (Getting contact from whois.apnic.net mirror)

Display data:

Abuse address in remarks/descr field: abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

whois.apnic.net found abuse contacts for 59.87.250.39 = abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

whois: 59.87.0.0 - 59.87.255.255 = abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Routing details for 59.87.250.39

Using abuse net on abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

abuse net usen.ad.jp = postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp, abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

Using best contacts postmaster[at]usen.ad.jp abuse[at]usen.ad.jp

WHOIS lookup already had the "abuse" address, but the

abuse.net lookup added the Postmaster address to the

list of targets. Seems like a penalty for someone doing

the 'right' thing ....????

Technically, the reporter could/should have de-selected the

'postmaster' address, but ... why was it offered at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feeling a but dense for some reason ....

Tracking message source: 59.87.250.39:

Re: 59.87.250.39 (Third party interested in email source)

spamcop[at]imaphost.com

Technically, I'm thinking that it looks OK.

On the other hand ....

Source IP 61.214.61.236

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1066583240zebc14e924b4e9ad0bb28bf3252f469f0z

2nd time today this happened (I deselected all the URL's for reporting)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

petzl:

You are going to have to be more complete in what you are complaining about here. As Wazoo has already stated, I don't see anything wrong with either of these parses.

Are you saying that when you look at the Previous Reports, it shows as not sending them even though you hit send reports and the parse says you did?

Or are you saying you cancelled these reports but they now the parses say the reports were sent?

The second link shows:

Reports regarding this spam have already been sent:

Re: 61.214.61.236 (Administrator of network where email originates)

Reportid: 1922936867 To: abuse[at]ocn.ad.jp

Reportid: 1922936876 To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

If reported today, reports would be sent to:...

which aligns with you deselecting the URL reports.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

petzl:

Or are you saying you cancelled these reports but they now the parses say the reports were sent?

The second link shows:

which aligns with you deselecting the URL reports.

I only cancelled reports to the web links not the IP spurce (which although states an abuse address did/does not send one?)

**from past reports**

Submitted: Saturday, 16 September 2006 9:01:29 AM +1000:

Ro|exMens&LadyVacheronPatekFrom200Bucks

1922936876 ( 61.214.61.236 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1922936867 ( 61.214.61.236 ) To:

Submitted: Saturday, 16 September 2006 3:27:46 PM +1000:

A Job offer

1923235473 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1923235467 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To:

1923235460 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To:

**

Not happened agian since or at least so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only cancelled reports to the web links not the IP spurce (which although states an abuse address did/does not send one?)

**from past reports**

Submitted: Saturday, 16 September 2006 9:01:29 AM +1000:

Ro|exMens&LadyVacheronPatekFrom200Bucks

1922936876 ( 61.214.61.236 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1922936867 ( 61.214.61.236 ) To:

Submitted: Saturday, 16 September 2006 3:27:46 PM +1000:

A Job offer

1923235473 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1923235467 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To:

1923235460 ( 59.87.250.39 ) To:

**

Not happened agian since or at least so far

Thank you for finally filling in the holes.

I think it might be equally likely the reports were sent but that the Past Reports page is not updating properly. It would require the deputies to check the outgoing logs to see which is correct, however.

None of my past reports, going back through 9/12 are showing the blank report like yours appear to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for finally filling in the holes.

I think it might be equally likely the reports were sent but that the Past Reports page is not updating properly. It would require the deputies to check the outgoing logs to see which is correct, however.

None of my past reports, going back through 9/12 are showing the blank report like yours appear to.

Low priority not happening again

No one else is asking so may of been a temporary glitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...