Jump to content

[Resolved] Your message has been rejected


Recommended Posts

from yestardy i am getting this error when trying to send to submit.?????????[at]spam.spamcop.net

the full error:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

Subject:

Sent: 05/06/2007 20:32

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

submit.????????[at]spam.spamcop.net on 05/06/2007 20:32

There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.

<?????.??????.org #5.5.0 smtp;550-Your message has been rejected as it appears to contain malware.>

Please help.

Thanks,

Tal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from yestardy i am getting this error when trying to send to submit.?????????[at]spam.spamcop.net

the full error:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

Subject:

Sent: 05/06/2007 20:32

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

submit.????????[at]spam.spamcop.net on 05/06/2007 20:32

There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.

<?????.??????.org #5.5.0 smtp;550-Your message has been rejected as it appears to contain malware.>

Spamcop does not reject any messages to the submit addresses, so my guess is your ISP has added outgoing filters to their servers. \Have you asked them why messages are getting rejected?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spamcop does not reject any messages to the submit addresses, so my guess is your ISP has added outgoing filters to their servers. \Have you asked them why messages are getting rejected?

I am hosting this Exchange server, maybe you can point me the right direction how to resolve this

Thanks,

Tal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hosting this Exchange server, maybe you can point me the right direction how to resolve this

?????.??????.org is your server? Was the submission a standard spam? Did it have an attachment? Is it possible the attachment had a virus?

Looking at the error again, it is possible the spam.spamcop.net mail servers have virus protection and it was rejected because of that. Virus messages are reportable, but they may need to be "defanged" (attachment removed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?????.??????.org is your server? Was the submission a standard spam? Did it have an attachment? Is it possible the attachment had a virus?

Looking at the error again, it is possible the spam.spamcop.net mail servers have virus protection and it was rejected because of that. Virus messages are reportable, but they may need to be "defanged" (attachment removed).

yes the ?????.??????.org is my email server, there where NO attchments and my server has virus checher that e-mail did not have any virus or malware.

To me its look like spam.spamcop.net blocking it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

submit.????????[at]spam.spamcop.net on 05/06/2007 20:32

There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.

<?????.??????.org #5.5.0 smtp;550-Your message has been rejected as it appears to contain malware.>

Please email me directly and send me a full copy of the rejection notice with nothing deleted or altered.

Contact me at: service[at]admin.spamcop.net

SpamCop doesn't reject mail, so I need to look into this, and I need specific details to go to the sysops with.

- Don D'Minion - SpamCop Admin -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hosting this Exchange server,

I must have been out of the room when someone decided to rename "Exchange Server" to Microsoft Commercial Internet System Internet Mail Service ...???? Is this really the same as "Exchange Server" ?????

resolved!!

I used Microsoft fix:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186142/en-us

look like it resolve the issue

That is simply scary .. a 2005 Registry hack for Microsoft Commercial Internet System version 1.0 .... and it boils down to the lack of using a FQDN .... wondeing how 'you' managed to only come into an issue 'now' ....

Congratulations on fixing this .. there is no way that something like this could have been 'guessed' by the data provided 'here' .... but it sure seems like something could be done to use something a little more current, functional on something facing the Internet ...????

Guess I'll tag this as Resolved ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...