cppgenius Posted July 1, 2008 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Can someone please have a look at the example below and tell me if you think whether it is suitable for public viewing? Is there anything else that should be munged or do you think all the private information of the recipient are adequately munged? The [at] sign will actually published literally as an [at]. From - Tue Jun 24 18:03:03 2008 X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: x X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: X-Apparently-To: x via 188.8.131.52; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:30:08 +0000 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 184.108.40.206 X-Originating-IP: [220.127.116.11] Authentication-Results: mta146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com from=frontier.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 18.104.22.168 (EHLO auh-b114972.alshamil.net.ae) (22.214.171.124) by mta146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:30:08 +0000 Message-ID: <x[at]suhrb> From: "garrett damrongs" <amy[at]frontier.net> To: x Subject: NEW Viagra Super Active !! Your Coupon #oGRyE. Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:42:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C8D2E2.053C8EFF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Any input are welcome. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.