Jump to content

yourbuddy trolling 4


yourbuddy

Recommended Posts

There will be a reply, perhaps many.

However, Spamcop is too aggressive to use in a production environment.

They act as Judge, Jury and Executioner (by proxy) based on the snitches.

Their snitches (and unidentified moles and spamtraps are often wrong, due

to various reasons - over-enthusiasm and just plain ignorance are some).

Stop using it, tell your ISP to stop using it - tell other ISP's to stop using it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will be a reply, perhaps many.
True.

However, Spamcop is too aggressive to use in a production environment.
That's what its legal advisors say. Many admins around the world disagree.

They act as Judge, Jury
SpamCop facilitates spam reporters' reports, it does not judge. ISPs' abuse desk personnel judge.

and Executioner (by proxy)
SpamCop facilitates spam reporters' reports, it does not execute. ISPs' abuse desk and legal personnel execute.

based on the snitches.
Reporters. If your neighbor across the street saw burglars trespassing on your property in the dead of night, wouldn't you want them to report that activity?

Their snitches (and unidentified moles and spamtraps are often wrong, due to various reasons - over-enthusiasm and just plain ignorance are some).
Incorrect syntax. Reporters who are wrong are disciplined.

Stop using it, tell your ISP to stop using it - tell other ISP's to stop using it.
One has to wonder what bad experience "yourbuddy" has had that caused "yourbuddy" to feel this way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You incorrectly blocked a large commercial ISP, of which we

(corporate user) are a customer. Your mistake was corrected,

after a considerable amount of inconvenience SpamCop caused

as Corporations and ISP mistakenly rely on your information.

What proof can you offer that the blocking was a mistake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...