Jump to content

Parsing problems


mwinton

Recommended Posts

I don't know how to get a tracking URL when I get an ERROR: No IP Found message. I only get a tracking URL when it is a successful report.

38011[/snapback]

What is the webpage you are on when you get the message. That should be the same as the tracking URL (with possible exception of the server it is running on).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you help me figure this out and report it to the correct source? It is still happening for me. Thanks!

37995[/snapback]

I sent the following, but my email to the WHOIS contact for infdz.com, mwinton[at]MIDAMERICA.NET, bounced at mail.midamerica.net due to "550 5.1.1 <mwinton[at]MIDAMERICA.NET>... User unknown":

From: "Jeff G."

To: <winserver.support[at]winserver.com>

Cc: "Jeff G."; <mwinton[at]MIDAMERICA.NET>; <mwinton[at]infdz.com>; <mwinton[at]spamcop.net>

Sent: Saturday 2005/12/17 11:51 [EST -0500]

Subject: Please Help Wildcat! SMTP Router Record "from" IP Address In Received Header Line.

Mr. Santos,

I have seen you providing help for Wildcat! email services and classifying yourself as being among "Anti-spam developers" on various mailing lists archived on the web, so I decided to approach you about the following. Please correct me if I was mistaken.

As you may have seen in SpamCop Forums Topic "Parsing problems" at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=5519 , I have been trying to help Dr. Winton use SpamCop to Parse and then Report spam received through his Wildcat! ESMTP Server and SMTP Router v6.1.451.5 on his server infdz.com. Unfortunately, my attempts have been unsuccessful because that combination is not always recording the source IP Address in a "from" clause in its Received Header Line.

Specifically, that combination is recording "Received: by infdz.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.1.451.5) for mwinton[at]infdz.com; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:34:15 -0600" rather than "Received: from example.invalid (example.com [192.168.1.1]) by infdz.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.1.451.5) for mwinton[at]infdz.com; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:34:15 -0600", where "example.invalid" is the HELO and "example.com" is the RDNS of connected source IP Address "192.168.1.1".

Please help me to help Dr. Winton. I have copied him using the various addresses of his that I found in that Topic and in WHOIS.

Thanks and Best Regards, Jeff G. http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...dpost&pid=37585

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the webpage you are on when you get the message.  That should be the same as the tracking URL (with possible exception of the server it is running on).

38012[/snapback]

http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog/

I use the main page with the QUICK - report immediately and trash option. I check a series of spam messages, and use the drop down box to report 2 or 3 at once. I get email notification later of the series of messages that I reported, but only successful reports give me a URL for tracking. Guess I won't use the Quick option until we get this sorted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I thought all my mail went through mail.infdz.com.

38009[/snapback]

Your [at]spamcop.net email isn't going through your mailserver, I was unsure about your midamerica.net email, and I didn't know about your earthlink.net email. Please fix the problem with the midamerica.net address - either get the address to work or ask Network Solutions to change it to one that does work. Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

url=http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z842856052zc6381913c53e41ec847bdf1fcd4bbdc6z]http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z842856052zc6...7bdf1fcd4bbdc6z[/url]

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z842855319zce...9bccebb3de42b9z

This is the one with the error: Submitted: Saturday, December 17, 2005 08:00:48 -0600:

=?ISO-8859-1?b?R29vZCBldmVuaW5n?=

No reports filed

38011[/snapback]

Why does one of these messages come through spamcop but the other does not? It looks like you have spamcop POP from your local server but then the first link is parsed without spamcop coming into play. Those headers (from the first message) look a lillte strange (specifically the top 4 lines).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...