alexz@abv.bg Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 ht tp://www.spamcop.net/mcgi - Sorry, all tests failed. We cannot deliver mail to the address you provided: alexz[at]blhr.org. Double check the address provided or try again later. Your mailhost appears to be offline. Detailed errors: Connecting to mail.step-in.biz.: smtpSend:smtpEnd: message transmission failed: 552 Sorry, this message appears to be spam (#5.6.0) Sometimes, mailservers are temporarilly unavailable. If you believe you have entered your email address and other details correctly, you might just wait a few minutes (or 24 hours) and try again. I sent a ticket to that host, from what I have found, their level of spam assasin is very low - 4, that is why, my wild guess is, it is rejecting mail from over here... what else I can do?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 As the link provided didn't actually go anywhere (due to only being a partial URL) I edited the starting post. To my mind, this does not seem to be a Parsing/Reporting issue, guessing that it is in fact related to th MailHost Confoguration of a Reporting Account, so will be moving this Topic with this post. There is no one 'here' that would have any idea/contol over your ISP's filter settings, and even the 'score of 4' can be generated many different ways. What is more likely is that a word filter is in use and it's triggering on seeing the word 'spam' ...???? Of course, based on so much spammer abuse of these 'new' Domain names, it's not that hard to conceive that step-in.biz may in fact have SpamCop.net specifically blocked ... no accusations, just years of previous experience showing here ..... Not said is whether you can whitelist any addresses. This and several other "lost, missing, bounced e-mail problems" are addressed in several FAQ entries found here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexz@abv.bg Posted December 3, 2006 Author Share Posted December 3, 2006 what is MORE strange to me - it worked for another mail at the same host! Mailhost name: blhr.org Email address: hrlawye{_at }blhr.org Hosts/Domains: Relaying IPs: - I am not shure - should I paste the URL where I get that?!? http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=mhedit;...hBtGlKbQd9jgZ4H - a little ammended - here it is... 10x! Mailhosts - it is from my session - I will find and post the header of the message which passed thru the test! Here it is! Return-Path: <service Delivered-To: hrlawyer Received: (qmail 28279 invoked by uid 399); 29 Nov 2006 12:38:17 -0000 Received: from localhost by pns.step-in.biz with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.7); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:38:18 +0200 From: SpamCop robot <mhconf.x[at]cmds.spamcop.net> To: hrlawyer[at]blhr.org Subject: *****spam***** [spamCop] account configuration email Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:38:15 GMT Message-Id: <wh456d7f37g104ba[at]msgid.spamcop.net> X-spam-Flag: YES X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on pns.step-in.biz X-spam-Level: **** X-spam-Status: Yes, score=4.0 required=4.0 tests=FORGED MUA MOZILLA, FROM LOCAL NOVOWEL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------= 456D7F3A.D76C60F8" ------------= 456D7F3A.D76C60F8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit spam detection software, running on the system "pns.step-in.biz", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello SpamCop user, This email contains special codes and tracking information to help SpamCop figure out your specific email configuration. Do not post this email in public. It contains confidential information related to the security of your SpamCop account. [...] Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 FROM LOCAL NOVOWEL From: localpart has series of non-vowel letters 1.5 FORGED MUA MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla NOD32 1888 (20061128) Information This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com Moderator EDIT: Removed secret code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 abv.bg' post='51665' date='Dec 3 2006, 04:03 AM'] a little ammended - here it is... 10x! Not amended quite enough. I found 2 copied of your secret code in that message and replaced them with x, but you should probably request a new code from deputies[at]spamcop.net just to be safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexz@abv.bg Posted December 11, 2006 Author Share Posted December 11, 2006 ok, will try it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexz@abv.bg Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 Even pass change goes to spam?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lking Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 As different ISPs change the parameters on their spam filters, this does happen. Although I have not seen it in a while, the fact that the word 'spam'/spamcop is found in the header has in the past caused a message from SpamCop to be flagged. The problem can easily be fixed if the ISP (Google) would white-list SpamCop.net. That of course is between you and Google. Not much SpamCop can do to fix this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisati Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 I've seen it happen from time to time too, when I've had copies of spam reports forwarded to me. When this happens, I usually log into webmail and mark the message as "not spam." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.